The X11 was staggeringly popular in these parts. Marketing people. Pah.
The X11 was staggeringly popular in these parts. Marketing people. Pah.
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
I feel the same way. They are boooorrrrinnnnggg at the moment. Where is the SV650 competitor? The SV650 is in generation two, probably heading for a makeover sometime in the near future. What about a proper hyperbike, ZX14 style? Or a balls out V4 sports bike? If honda made one of those again, I'd be there with the requisite pile of money and firstborn to get one.
Thought from what I have read (but not experienced..) the current CBR1000 and CBR600 are signs that Honda might have got it's groove back. The new 600 hornet is at least an attempt at being adventurous. They even let Italians design it...
I still reckon Honda were heading down the right track with the X11, as Hitcher has mentioned on numerous occasions it was a dead duck despite being the quickest naked bike ever produced at the time.
I think the Hornet looks more appealing to most people so, in my opinion, an X11-Hornet hybrid using the Blackbird engine would be fantastic. Even the comics that slagged the X11 could not get away from the brutal performance offered by the X11, courtesy of the 'bird engine.
Using the CBR1000 motor could make it too Fazer like i.e. bias still towards top end rush at the expense of, albeit slight, bottom end grunt.
Saw this a while ago (not sure where I saw it but did save it), I would buy one at the drop of a hat....
Along with a revamped CB600F Hornet, Honda is expected to dump the old CBR engine in the CB900F and bring out a heftier version of the CBF1000 engine for a brand new CB1000F Hornet. Styling will be more adventurous than the CBF hopefully. A CBF1000 engine means the latest generation Fireblade genes, but with much more than 100bhp this time. To bring it up to the level of the competition from Yamaha FZ1 and Kawasaki Z1000 it needs more than 130bhp. Our best guesses is a max power output of around the 140bhp mark. We also believe that the bike will get a very similar chassis to the CBR1000RR to really make an impact on the big nakeds market. Honda has got the CBF1000 for the sensible types so no problem to make the big Hornet both powerful and sporty.
Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.
Fuck Japanese bikes are ugly.
Oooh thats ugly!
Eh? The 600 Hornet is generally rated better than the SV650 in the tests I've seen. Not that the SV650 is bad, the Hornet just edges it out, and all the other 650s (except the Speed Four when it was current).
The Hornet 600 had an update to the current CBR engine as well as usd forks etc but the 600 had carbs so had to be updated to meet emissions controls. The CB900F already has injection so there is not the same pressing need to update it.
In Europe, of course, they also have the choice of the made-in-Italy CBF1000.
On the other hand the whole Honda range has been around for a long time now.
How about a V4 CBR1000RR?
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
I was thinking a 600ccish twin. The old Bros doesn't count, it is not in production. And it has 3 valves per cylinder... The Hornet 600 is really a competitor to the GSR600, the FZ6 and the Z750. Some people don't like 4 cylinders, and my eye sees shitloads of SV650s out there, and more Kawasaki ER-6 thingies than Yamaha FZ6es and Kawasaki Z750s despite the ER-6 being a newer model, so people are voting with their wallets on that one.
And blue-wing don't sell it here anyway. I had a go on a 600 hornet once, it was better than a 919 Hornet because it wasn't as good. If you follow. Kinda like a vacuum cleaner with a seat and two wheels.And they have probably fucked it in the process. Leave the CBR600 engine in un-altered for gods sake.The Hornet 600 had an update to the current CBR engine as well as usd forks etc but the 600 had carbs so had to be updated to meet emissions controls. The CB900F already has injection so there is not the same pressing need to update it.Yes, and it is the most boring range of motorcycles out there at the moment.On the other hand the whole Honda range has been around for a long time now.That would be called an RVF1000. They don't make it. They won't. There is more of a chance of a MotoGP replica being made than that. Because Honda is boring us to death these days. Perhaps I could find a VF1000R and shove that engine into a old Foxeye Fireblade frame to make life interesting.How about a V4 CBR1000RR?
Hmm..
Project.
I ride a Suzuki because I have always liked Suzuki or Yamaha but everybody seems to always be bagging Honda, why? they do their job and they certainly get the results on the race tracks.....is it because they are the oldest/biggest/ what?
"Those who criticize our generation forget who raised it.
When government accepts responsibility for people, then people no longer take responsibility for themselves. ~George Pataki![]()
You cant be late until you show up.
:
For me, I think it is because it is hard to generate lust over the current models.
I like lots of past Honda models, my old RVF![]()
, the RC30 and the RC45, the original model GL1000, the CB750, an 80's XL250. Always thought the SP1 and SP2 were cool.
I mean, do many watch SBK and dribble all over the fireblade?
Do I still want a RC45? Hell yes.
Ooh look. It's Ruben Xaus on an old Honda!
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
http://www.worldsbk.com/rider.php?p_...Conduttore=658
Check out his race number.
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks