Fisheries protection.
The P-3's play the same game, just that the fisho's monitor the P-3 frequencies and know when they are taking off...
Ship info.
http://www.navy.mil.nz/visit-the-fle...ha/default.htm
Fisheries protection.
The P-3's play the same game, just that the fisho's monitor the P-3 frequencies and know when they are taking off...
Ship info.
http://www.navy.mil.nz/visit-the-fle...ha/default.htm
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Close but no. I think we're still below critical mass (in term of tax base) to effectively do everything, so we need to pick on one or two and do them well (or converslay, pick on most, but not all). That's what is happening but stil... not so well.
Naval breakdowns, all manner of shitty problems with the forces etc. Equipment and training could and should be better. I don't pretend we can be all things with only 4 million. Double the population and things change exponentially to a point where (assuming your comment on Sweden is accurate) we might be able to do all things as needed.
What cover do the Swedes get from the rest of the EU and/or NATO though (other than protection fro ridicule of being a "Swede")? Do Sweden actually provide all the requeisite aspects of defence or work together with other specialist nations as part of a defence "whole"?
$2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details
The two ANZAC Frigates are new coming up ten years I believe...
There is new vessels being built (The Protector Fleet)
http://www.navy.mil.nz/visit-the-fle...or/default.htm
The Fleet
http://www.navy.mil.nz/visit-the-fleet/default.htm
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
ANZAC frigates were 1997 1998 if I remember correctly, served on them and the Canterbury (leander class) They break down but what doesnt? Its hardly a revelation
NZ has a very large coast line (including some of the Islands under our unbrella) Under our Alliance Agreements we have to meet certain requirements including Border Proction, Fishiery Protroll, Search and Rescue, and many other things in the civial role...
in time of war, our fleet merges with the Aussie fleet to meet any threat. Which will happen with our other armed forces as such
We spend quite a bit less of tax dollars "per capita" than Aussie. In other words, for each taxpayer, the aussies spend more on defence than NZ does - and by quite a margin. We just blow it all on sickness beneficiaries, dole bludgers, funding roading contractors new luxury yachts, and pay increases for MP's so they can spend our money on everything but the hard working middle class - who actually pay tax.
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
It's pretty bloody good by itself although it probably might have something to do with their neighbour. While the threat over the years has changed, they are adapting to it.
http://www.mil.se/article.php?lang=E&id=15694
Quite impressive for a "Neutral, Socialist country"
A common theme , but IMH(and lay)O, incorrect. For NZ, the most effective defence is still a naval one.
There is no nation that we would be at all likely to have to worry about, except the USA, that would have the capability to mount an aerial invasion. It's by no means as easy as people imagine.
Certainly Indonesia or someone could send some planes to shoot stuff up (though I dunno if Indonesia has anything with the capability to get hear and back without refuelling), and kill a few people. Hell of a jump from that to a maintained invasion.
That was one call that Dear Leader got right. All our defence money (such as it is) should go into the Navy, and militia type training along the lines of Switzland.
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks