When my old man taught me how to drive (he started driving trucks in the Army at 16) we went everywhere and on any surface.
Once spent three hours on gravel roads with him getting me to gradually go quicker until the car started to break away so I learn how to correct properly.
He also once dragged me out in a thunderstorm so I could learn how to control the car while aquaplanning.
It's these sort of lessons that a majority of learners are missing out on.
Having an instinctive reaction to loss of traction has saved my bacon on a couple of occassions.
The stock standard govt road safety message of slowing down doesn't help drivers that don't know what to do in the first place.
Scum, can I ask for your candid opinion on the matter of the 'revenue-raising' issue. Obviously, don't answer if it will attract shit, but....
Is it true that speed detection systems/resulting tickets really is a revenue-gathering exercise, or do the authorities truly believe that the uniform speed limits actually save lives?
I'm curious because the various uniform speed-limits are frequently ridiculous.
There are many sections of road, here in the North Island upon which, even if I get so down and dirty as to be grinding metal off my pegs, I still could never exceed 70 (maybe) Ks. Yet I'm perfectly entitled to have a crack at 100Ks in those same corners.
Now take the wide-open motorway mentioned in my opening dissertation. There's not one corner on it which, at even 500Ks, could I get a peg on the ground. but I'd get turned over for doing 111Ks.
The comparisons suggest uniform speed limits don't make sense to me, unless revenue collection is, in fact, a part of the equation.
Only 'Now' exists in reality.
Going out on a lim here but...
Imagine if for one day everybody in this country didnt exceed the speed limit.
Where would the governments revenue collecting be then
Pipe dreams are free i supose.![]()
If you cant fix it with a hammer, Its an electrical problem.
You're kidding yourself if you think kiwi's are good drivers - be thankful we get 100kph (I can still remember when 80kph was the limit). Compared to the europeans kiwi drivers are plain awful. Combine that with roads that are just plain rough, poorly maintained, and power poles and fences right on the edge suggests to me adding more speed isn't the answer.
If you want to change the law get voted into parliament as an MP - get on to the appropriate committee or introduce a bill into parliament raising the speed limit (the "Everyone Can Drive As Fast As Dpex Believes He Can Safely Ride On A Public Road Act") and convince your colleagues to vote for it. The only way to change the system is from within![]()
"More and more girls are keen to get a leg over." Katherine Prumm Sunday Star Times, Nov 2, 2008:
you have to be a pom........
have you not yet realised that NZ drivers are fucking idiots and should not really allowed to do 50 K let alone 140.
Please NOTE: If I offend you with any of my posts or comments, please remember that.
1. I do it on purpose
2. I dont give a shit
3. Tell some one who cares.
You are joking, right?
Kiwi fuckwit drivers have NO idea how to keep left, under any circumstance.
That technology is very close indeed. An informed chap keeps harking on about how soon that will be. His estimate is "around five years" from now.
This is involving NO human input. Speed and steering will be vehicle controlled...![]()
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Speed kills? yeah right...make a good Tui's ad. If speed kills then every circuit rider should be dead by now. It is the decision making, or lack there of, that kills.
Just take a look at some of the muppets driving.....you wouldn't let half of them ride a push bike let alone drive a vehicle....some cant even read road signs! Our (meaning their) poor performance is the reason why we could never adopt things from overseas like a free left turn at a red light, higher speed limits and also why we have those fucking annoying no right turn red arrows whereby even though there is no oncoming traffic we still have to wait for a green.
The roading planners do their utmost best to contribute to the road toll too. How many crappy road surfaces, reverse camber corners, cheesecutter barriers, poorly sequenced traffic signals and massive road edge drainage ditches do we see? Or passing lanes that finish on the brow of a hill or going into a corner...brilliant.
They shamelessly promote the use of SH16 as the alternate route north from Auckland yet it does not have one passing lane from Kumeu through to Wellsford and despite it being well travelled by stock and horse trucks it only has about 5 or 6 places to pass safely from Helensville onwards.
Look at the money wasted on these ridiculous on ramp metering signals. Is someone getting a backhander for installing these? All they do is create a gap between the light and queue that still forms at the end of the ramp. The Waterview on ramp, Westbound at Pt Chev, is a stroke of shear genius. 3 lanes all with just 50 metres to merge into 1 before getting on to the motorway lane and all starting off at the same time! Surely there are much better ways to have spent that cash.
To top it all off (no pun intended) they now want to lower the drink drive limit. Why? It is not the person at, or just under, the limit that is causing the carnage. It is the recidivist moron who is many times over the limit; probably has been convicted numerous times and still has no license.
A limit will never replace or be a substitute for common sense.
I follow the 50/50/90 rule.
Anytime I have a 50/50 chance of getting it right there is a 90% probability I will get it wrong
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Elite Fight Club - Proudly promoting common sense and safe riding since 2024
http://1199s.wordpress.com
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
Yes it is usually the hitting something that kills. The question is how it was hit and what lack of judgment lead to it.
Just because a section of road has a particular speed limit does not entitle anyone to automatically do that speed. It is a maximum permitted speed. Sure you might not be able to take it at that speed but perhaps certain sports cars could.
I follow the 50/50/90 rule.
Anytime I have a 50/50 chance of getting it right there is a 90% probability I will get it wrong
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks