hell yes i want power!!!
na i love my smoky cb125t
no, its too big of a motor
only if the 250's are 2 valve
chuck norris's calender goes from march 31st to april 2nd
No one fools chuck norris.......
PML this thread just keeps getting betterer and betterer!!!
Keep ya PMS to yourself...
Please explain why. A 1000cc engine with a 24 mm carb wont produce any more power than a 125cc engine with a 24 mm carb. The power output of any engine is simply a fuction of how hard it can breathe multiplied by the pressure increase through heating the air that it is pumping through. limiting the intake and exhaust sizes puts a limit on the HP that can be produced, so why worry if someone wants to use a huge capacity to do that?
Time to ride
Kart tracks. Physical mass. Human ingenuity. Three reasons it's a bad idea. Mostly Buckets run on kart tracks. Much tighter than a race track so a small light bike has an advantage. Some 'wanker' will have a bight idea and stuff a 1000cc engine into an H100 and gain a 'unfair' advantage. It would either develop or kill the class. It's doing fine as it is.
I think a 1000cc with a 24mm carb will produce more than 15hp. Only one cylinder at a time will be breathing. Most 125's are single cylinder. So straight away you have a 250cc high torque engine breathing with a 24mm carb.
The same reasoning can be applied to 125 cc two stroke twins. With a properly designed intake manifold only one cylinder is breathing at a time so almost double the power could be produced. this is the same priciple that Burt Munroe applied to his Indian; a single carb supplying both cylinders.
Time to ride
Except the 125's are two stroke and the dynamics of the carb are more important and also (as a two stroke) everything happens twice as often.
Your Burt Munroe example is a good reason why NOT to allow it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks