Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Clarifying F3 rules for watercooled twins

  1. #1
    Join Date
    30th July 2008 - 10:02
    Bike
    89 Honda VFR400
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    368

    Clarifying F3 rules for watercooled twins

    Hi Guys, just had a look at the rules, and saw that 4.3 (b) doesnt allow twins over 640cc to be watercooled - 4.3 (b) or am I missing something major? http://www.mnz.co.nz/download/Append...mula_Three.pdf .

    I know its under the 2 valve per cylinder paragraph, but why wouldnt these be allowed to be watercooled, and the models with over 2 vpc not? Am I being thick as shit, or does this not make sense to somebody else too?

    Cheers

  2. #2
    Join Date
    13th January 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    Honda PC800
    Location
    Henderson -auckland
    Posts
    14,163
    what file was that dude??
    I supect its a typo 650cc twins not 640
    To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    30th July 2008 - 10:02
    Bike
    89 Honda VFR400
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    368
    Quote Originally Posted by FROSTY View Post
    what file was that dude??
    I supect its a typo 650cc twins not 640
    From this page http://www.mnz.co.nz/competitionrules.aspx , here the current rules http://www.motorcyclingnz.co.nz/down...egulations.pdf , heres the proposed rules http://www.mnz.co.nz/download/Append...mula_Three.pdf

    Both say the same thing? Meebe SVs have to run with empty radiators

  4. #4
    Join Date
    14th January 2004 - 13:00
    Bike
    XT600
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    763
    4.3b is restricted to 2 valves per cylinder (e.g Ducati SS) which allows up to 750cc, with the restriction that over 640cc must not be water cooled.
    (this specifically excluded things like a 748 which is a multi valve, watercooled twin under 750cc)

    4.3c deal with SV650 and the like. i.e more than 3 valves per cylinder. Limited to 650cc with additional restrictions as detailed.
    Don't see how that's so hard?
    Actrix Internet No Hair race team



  5. #5
    Join Date
    30th July 2008 - 10:02
    Bike
    89 Honda VFR400
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    368
    Quote Originally Posted by svs View Post
    Don't see how that's so hard?
    Yeah, I got that, just seems strange to me that a 650 2 valve watercooled bike isnt allowed, and a 650 4 valve watercooled bike is?

    Probably just a moot point, but I just wondered why nothing about the cooling type was mentioned for 3 or more vpc.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    25th October 2002 - 12:00
    Bike
    Old Blue, Little blue
    Location
    31.29.57.11, 116.22.22.22
    Posts
    4,864
    Someone hasn't thought it through......?
    “- He felt that his whole life was some kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.”

  7. #7
    Join Date
    13th December 2004 - 10:05
    Bike
    SV400
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Benk View Post
    Yeah, I got that, just seems strange to me that a 650 2 valve watercooled bike isnt allowed, and a 650 4 valve watercooled bike is?

    Probably just a moot point, but I just wondered why nothing about the cooling type was mentioned for 3 or more vpc.
    Is that the only strange thing in the F3 rules you can find. The whole thing is filled with contradictions and gray areas.

    Half the battle in being competitive in F3 is finding the loopholes and rules that allow one to build a bike with an advantage over other competitors. Also making sure that those in the position of passing judgement on what is and isn't legal agree with you.

    Then all you need is the right monkey to pilot it and your onto a winner.

    I love the Ozzy 450 concept but that bike still needs a good rider to be at the pointy end!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    4th February 2007 - 08:43
    Bike
    Gone as sick of bull shit
    Location
    not on here
    Posts
    111

    Gee a bike needs a good rider to be at the Front??

    I love the Ozzy 450 concept but that bike still needs a good rider to be at the pointy end![/QUOTE]

    Wow Gary,
    I would never have thought that a bike needed a good rider to run at the front. Thanks for pointing that out!
    Ozzy Performance, Chris Osborne, 027-2211-028
    ozzy@4d.co.nz

  9. #9
    Join Date
    23rd January 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    ninja 250
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    5,024
    Yeah, I'd like to see the bike that doesn't require a good rider to run at the front.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    16th November 2005 - 07:48
    Bike
    I just lost count
    Location
    The District of Waipa
    Posts
    3,607
    Quote Originally Posted by gav View Post
    Yeah, I'd like to see the bike that doesn't require a good rider to run at the front.
    I would pay very good money for that bike

    For the record Qkkid was in my bed, not the other way round

    Quote Originally Posted by Yow Ling View Post
    Pumba is a wise man.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    9th April 2008 - 21:42
    Bike
    all sorts
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    238
    Blog Entries
    1

    F3 Rules

    Quote Originally Posted by GSVR View Post
    Is that the only strange thing in the F3 rules you can find. The whole thing is filled with contradictions and gray areas.

    Half the battle in being competitive in F3 is finding the loopholes and rules that allow one to build a bike with an advantage over other competitors. Also making sure that those in the position of passing judgement on what is and isn't legal agree with you.

    Then all you need is the right monkey to pilot it and your onto a winner.

    I love the Ozzy 450 concept but that bike still needs a good rider to be at the pointy end!
    Hi.
    Instead of sitting at your keyboard and picking holes in the rules do something constructive and rewrite them and then put them forward for discussion.
    Be part of the solution rather than throwing stones from the sidelines, its far more rewarding.

    Kevin Goddard

  12. #12
    Join Date
    5th February 2008 - 13:07
    Bike
    2006 Hyosung GT650R
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    7,141
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin G View Post
    Instead of sitting at your keyboard and picking holes in the rules do something constructive and rewrite them and then put them forward for discussion.
    Be part of the solution rather than throwing stones from the sidelines, its far more rewarding.
    No one respects that process, because usually submissions from mere mortals get flushed straight straight down the toilet. People don't speak up when they believe they will be ignored.

    If your organisation wants respect, it should hand the rules over to its members with some formal process, and leave them to write their own rules. Why not begin that process with a publicly editable document in a wiki somewhere, and when its nice and concrete then transition the document into place as the revised set of rules. Such a thing will cost you nothing and gain respect, and propel your organisation forward.

    Steve
    "I am a licenced motorcycle instructor, I agree with dangerousbastard, no point in repeating what he said."
    "read what Steve says. He's right."
    "What Steve said pretty much summed it up."
    "I did axactly as you said and it worked...!!"
    "Wow, Great advise there DB."
    WTB: Hyosung bikes or going or not.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    5th February 2008 - 13:07
    Bike
    2006 Hyosung GT650R
    Location
    BOP
    Posts
    7,141
    Quote Originally Posted by GSVR View Post
    Half the battle in being competitive in F3 is finding the loopholes and rules that allow one to build a bike with an advantage over other competitors. Also making sure that those in the position of passing judgement on what is and isn't legal agree with you.
    Well is that a valid part of racing or not? It seems that a large part of the entertainment value comes from that, and it also pushes people to think innovatively.

    Steve
    "I am a licenced motorcycle instructor, I agree with dangerousbastard, no point in repeating what he said."
    "read what Steve says. He's right."
    "What Steve said pretty much summed it up."
    "I did axactly as you said and it worked...!!"
    "Wow, Great advise there DB."
    WTB: Hyosung bikes or going or not.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    13th December 2004 - 10:05
    Bike
    SV400
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Kevin G View Post
    Hi.
    Instead of sitting at your keyboard and picking holes in the rules do something constructive and rewrite them and then put them forward for discussion.
    Be part of the solution rather than throwing stones from the sidelines, its far more rewarding.

    Kevin Goddard
    All been done before sorry! This is and old Kiwibiker pastime and I have emailed MNZ on occasion with very little satisfaction.

    Infact I could bring up the most contentious issue of last season in this class as MNZ has made very little in the way of a statement or clarifation and modified the rule only slightly.

    I wont bother asking for clarification on here like other posts are doing (and I have done in the past). Email MNZ for rule clarifications.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    13th December 2004 - 10:05
    Bike
    SV400
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,173
    Quote Originally Posted by DangerousBastard View Post
    Well is that a valid part of racing or not? It seems that a large part of the entertainment value comes from that, and it also pushes people to think innovatively.

    Steve
    Its part of the challenge. The more competitive and professional the racing becomes the more significant a part it plays.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •