List of arguments against levy
I have taken the liberty of making changes to the Wiki page regarding the ACC levy to more clearly structure our arguments.
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/wiki/2009_ACC_levy_proposal
Having lived in other countries, I am convinced that the ACC is a Very Good Thing™ for New Zealand generally, and for anyone involved in sports as dangerous as ours. You may disagree, but try to be pragmatic - are you likely to be able to change this institution whilst arguing against this particular levy - I think not.
Now successive governments need to make the ACC work financially, and I also doubt we can change National's intention to increase funding by this levy. I suggest therefore, that we accept National wants to charge us for the burden our sport represents, and put our best effort into ensuring the levy is at least applied fairly.
I've spent a lot of time trying to summarize other writers' posts and to be as clear as possible, but if you can improve meaning, you absolutely should do so. You should also add your own arguments.
If you are unfamiliar with Wiki usage, you are encouraged to read the guidelines (on the site itself, left hand menu) and be bold - we are able to undo errors. Your object is to improve the document as a whole, which means respecting and improving others' arguments as well as your own.
It is very important that we present clear, well-reasoned arguments (or otherwise persuade Winston Peters to support our cause, since he seems to have made a career out of ignoring clear and well-reasoned arguments
) To this end, the wiki might summarize our position, and enable our organizers to clearly express the opinion of our community to political leaders.
(I have not entered into the whole off-road debate, and I'm not sure it's relevant since clearly, National are seeking to make this charge to road users.)
Cheers!
L@
What can we do; we're only men.
Bookmarks