Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 52

Thread: Top-out springs?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    14th October 2009 - 11:17
    Bike
    Legion
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Taylor View Post
    Its just that our workload is mental
    Sounds like you need more employees - I just so happen to know an American looking for a job......

  2. #17
    Join Date
    20th December 2007 - 03:24
    Bike
    the town bike, everybody's ridden her.
    Location
    away
    Posts
    127
    http://www.onthethrottle.com/content/view/375/40/


    Robert will like these guys thoughts on top out springs.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    14th October 2009 - 11:17
    Bike
    Legion
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    95
    It seems some tuners advocate removing them from the shocks and some don't.

    As Mr Taylor said, Penske does not use them. I do not know what Showa does on their kit and works stuff.

    I know that years ago one factory AMA team had tested shocks with and without top out springs and that at least one rider preferred the top out spring removed.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    29th January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    2006 Suzuki GSX-R750 K6
    Location
    Te Puke
    Posts
    2,970
    Quote Originally Posted by Yankee Doodle Dandy View Post
    one rider preferred
    There is the relevant point.
    Not every rider likes the same thing.
    As a suspension tuner, you can't say "when I want your opinion, I'll give it to you"
    You've got to find out what the rider WANTS
    Member, sem fiddy appreciation society


    Quote Originally Posted by PrincessBandit View Post
    I find it ironic that the incredibly rude personal comments about Les were made by someone bearing an astonishing resemblance to a Monica Lewinsky dress accessory.

    Quote Originally Posted by PrincessBandit View Post
    All was good until I realised that having 105kg of man sliding into my rear was a tad uncomfortable after a while

  5. #20
    Join Date
    11th June 2007 - 08:55
    Bike
    None
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    5,053
    Quote Originally Posted by JD Racing View Post
    http://www.onthethrottle.com/content/view/375/40/


    Robert will like these guys thoughts on top out springs.
    Yes I have just watched it, why do these guys effectively ''assume'' or even mislead that there is only one rate of topout spring? They are not hard to change and do quickly if you have a vacuum bleeder to hand. In some ways I suspect that many trackside tuners dont like this added variable.............??

    Soft springs have to be balanced with soft top out springs.

    At Philip Island WSBK pre season tests nearly two years ago I spent a whole day testing varying rates and lengths of top out springs with Katsu Fujiwara. We also tested with no top out springs but an important point here is that with no top out springs you also have to run a steeper nose part of the low speed rebound damping curve, the curve has to be reshaped with a new valving and bleed clicker setting. Thats another subject!

    Conclusions from that test were that when everything was balanced properly you had better rear wheel stability under braking and more sidegrip with top out springs, it did show on the telemetry.

    Note that the oem 07 ZX6RR has a dreaded topout spring!!

    Shortly we are going to test a new Race Tech shock, they in line with US thinking do not have a top out spring. Im open minded, this will be interesting.

    Ph: 06 751 2100 * Email: robert@kss.net.nz
    Mob: 021 825 514 * Fax: 06 751 4551

  6. #21
    Join Date
    14th October 2009 - 11:17
    Bike
    Legion
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by Pussy View Post
    You've got to find out what the rider WANTS
    The problem is that a lot of riders have no clue what they want.

    What is the worst thing a rider can say to his mechanic/tuner?

  7. #22
    Join Date
    3rd November 2005 - 08:10
    Bike
    GSXR450
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    7,037
    Quote Originally Posted by Yankee Doodle Dandy View Post
    The problem is that a lot of riders have no clue what they want.

    What is the worst thing a rider can say to his mechanic/tuner?



    Fix it, NOW
    I fear the day technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots! ALBERT EINSTEIN

  8. #23
    Join Date
    8th February 2009 - 16:51
    Bike
    Kawasaki ZX6
    Location
    here
    Posts
    2
    Sorry to butt in; but my involvement is not high enough to send PM's, or I would have! So, this is the only way to show a little info-update stuff...

    T/O's are like RT said a massive subject, heaps of fun when you have them all in your toy-box and have played with them in conjunction with shock designs and linkages; damper curve shapes (etc etc), the practicable possibilities, they go on and on!

    Anyhow, back on topic: we have had these Penske neg. springs since the end of last year - they're OK; but their approach I suppose you might say is closer to how Factory Showa play things, and thus a similar approach is required....

    As regards that D Moss character, nah I ain't feeling it there at all (tuning is all internal, the rest is knob-juggling!) - nearly each one of those videos promotes something just plain wrong (sag setting? please!); to make a video for helping everyone comprehend more than they do is one thing; but should said video misrepresent the subject matter, or in some way or other be ambiguous, then it causes harm n'est pas?!

    One such EG that comes to mind is when he has an FGK kit in a 675 and thus proclaims that if it is 2 clicks out or 9 clicks out @ the rebound then it must be one type of valving or the other (presumably between 1670-01/2061 or -04/-03 pistons and related spec changes). However one should never promote rebound to be run that low if possible, to allude as such is potentially harmful! (grrr!)

    Anyways, I'm off - gotta say it is lovely to see you all so interested in things; but I have no intention of living in NZ again for the foreseeable future (tho' never say never eh!); so shan't bother you all; just thought you may have interest in the 2009 Penske optional update...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	stuff001.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	126.2 KB 
ID:	148304   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	stuff002.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	112.5 KB 
ID:	148305  

  9. #24
    Join Date
    11th June 2007 - 08:55
    Bike
    None
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    5,053
    Quote Originally Posted by DrZeeple View Post
    Sorry to butt in; but my involvement is not high enough to send PM's, or I would have! So, this is the only way to show a little info-update stuff...

    T/O's are like RT said a massive subject, heaps of fun when you have them all in your toy-box and have played with them in conjunction with shock designs and linkages; damper curve shapes (etc etc), the practicable possibilities, they go on and on!

    Anyhow, back on topic: we have had these Penske neg. springs since the end of last year - they're OK; but their approach I suppose you might say is closer to how Factory Showa play things, and thus a similar approach is required....

    As regards that D Moss character, nah I ain't feeling it there at all (tuning is all internal, the rest is knob-juggling!) - nearly each one of those videos promotes something just plain wrong (sag setting? please!); to make a video for helping everyone comprehend more than they do is one thing; but should said video misrepresent the subject matter, or in some way or other be ambiguous, then it causes harm n'est pas?!

    One such EG that comes to mind is when he has an FGK kit in a 675 and thus proclaims that if it is 2 clicks out or 9 clicks out @ the rebound then it must be one type of valving or the other (presumably between 1670-01/2061 or -04/-03 pistons and related spec changes). However one should never promote rebound to be run that low if possible, to allude as such is potentially harmful! (grrr!)

    Anyways, I'm off - gotta say it is lovely to see you all so interested in things; but I have no intention of living in NZ again for the foreseeable future (tho' never say never eh!); so shan't bother you all; just thought you may have interest in the 2009 Penske optional update...
    Thanks for the input and Im glad that Im not the only one that is wary of Dave Moss's ''blanket'' statements. Its posted on the internet so it must be correct? (Yeah right ) I rather think that the engineers at the Ohlins factory know rather more about top out springs than he does! ( I was up in Sweden a month or so ago and was discussing top out springs with the racing manager )
    Concedingly yes youve got to have a big box of toys, dedication and willing articulate riders to get the best out of it. In NZ the riders that spring to mind that fall into that category are Andrew Stroud, Craig Shirriffs and Shaun Harris.

    Interesting that Penske now offer such an option, there are a few other things they do rather well.

    Ph: 06 751 2100 * Email: robert@kss.net.nz
    Mob: 021 825 514 * Fax: 06 751 4551

  10. #25
    Join Date
    20th December 2007 - 03:24
    Bike
    the town bike, everybody's ridden her.
    Location
    away
    Posts
    127
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Taylor View Post
    Yes I have just watched it, why do these guys effectively ''assume'' or even mislead that there is only one rate of topout spring? They are not hard to change and do quickly if you have a vacuum bleeder to hand. In some ways I suspect that many trackside tuners dont like this added variable.............??

    Soft springs have to be balanced with soft top out springs.

    At Philip Island WSBK pre season tests nearly two years ago I spent a whole day testing varying rates and lengths of top out springs with Katsu Fujiwara. We also tested with no top out springs but an important point here is that with no top out springs you also have to run a steeper nose part of the low speed rebound damping curve, the curve has to be reshaped with a new valving and bleed clicker setting. Thats another subject!

    Conclusions from that test were that when everything was balanced properly you had better rear wheel stability under braking and more sidegrip with top out springs, it did show on the telemetry.

    Note that the oem 07 ZX6RR has a dreaded topout spring!!

    Shortly we are going to test a new Race Tech shock, they in line with US thinking do not have a top out spring. Im open minded, this will be interesting.

    The top out springs would have no impact on side grip unless you were running exceptionally long ones, the G loading mid turn would take you well out of the range of the top out, the changes in side grip would be explained by the changes in the low speed and bleed that you'd made.

    Top out springs add a geometry element to the suspensions function, for example long top out springs in the forks can stop wheelies but so can steeper swing arm angles they can also make the forks work low in the stroke making the steering nervous, nervous steering can also be caused by a steeper swing arm angle. You need to look at all aspects of the bike, head angle, offset, trail, crank height, swing arm angle, wheelbase etc, etc.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    11th June 2007 - 08:55
    Bike
    None
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    5,053
    Quote Originally Posted by JD Racing View Post
    The top out springs would have no impact on side grip unless you were running exceptionally long ones, the G loading mid turn would take you well out of the range of the top out, the changes in side grip would be explained by the changes in the low speed and bleed that you'd made.

    Top out springs add a geometry element to the suspensions function, for example long top out springs in the forks can stop wheelies but so can steeper swing arm angles they can also make the forks work low in the stroke making the steering nervous, nervous steering can also be caused by a steeper swing arm angle. You need to look at all aspects of the bike, head angle, offset, trail, crank height, swing arm angle, wheelbase etc, etc.
    It depends on what part of the corner we are talking about of course. If its about corner entry leading up to transition then yes the top out spring does have an effect on sidegrip. And isnt suspension also about controlling / regulating change of geometry.

    Ph: 06 751 2100 * Email: robert@kss.net.nz
    Mob: 021 825 514 * Fax: 06 751 4551

  12. #27
    Join Date
    20th December 2007 - 03:24
    Bike
    the town bike, everybody's ridden her.
    Location
    away
    Posts
    127
    I think we have a difference in the definition of sidegrip there, sidegrip to me is during and after the transition, not before. If you have a rider who's backing it in all the way to the apex, side grip is not an issue, it's only when the front brake is released and weight trnsfers to the rear that side grip is important.

    Some parts of a suspension unit control geometry to an extent, top out springs to me have more of a geometry function than a suspension function.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    14th October 2009 - 11:17
    Bike
    Legion
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by Yankee Doodle Dandy View Post
    What is the worst thing a rider can say to his mechanic/tuner?
    Quote Originally Posted by Shaun View Post
    Fix it, NOW
    Nope.

    Its "I was thinking........."

  14. #29
    Join Date
    3rd November 2005 - 08:10
    Bike
    GSXR450
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    7,037
    Quote Originally Posted by Yankee Doodle Dandy View Post
    Nope.

    Its "I was thinking........."


    Ha ha, and in 3 hours from that comment, YOU have a totaly different bike! Whether it works or not is another ? though
    I fear the day technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots! ALBERT EINSTEIN

  15. #30
    Join Date
    14th October 2009 - 11:17
    Bike
    Legion
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    95
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert Taylor View Post
    Soft springs have to be balanced with soft top out springs.
    I figured that the stiffer the main spring, the stiffer the top out spring.

    I checked a couple of the Ohlins spec cards to get an idea of how much they increase the top out springs rate in conjunction with a higher rate main spring and I found interestingly enough, Ohlins matches up a 4 N/mm top springs with 9.0 N/mm main springs in their FGK 132 (GSX-R600/750) kit but then installs a 3.5 N/mm top out springs with 9.5 N/mm main springs in their FGK 138 (Ducati 848/1098) kit.
    Last edited by Yankee Doodle Dandy; 25th October 2009 at 11:15. Reason: clarification reasons

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •