Just a few figures on the matter (now i dont know if the OP was including SUV's in his orignal post but they are one of my pet peevs as well as vehicles driving round the cities with bull bars on) these are just some i found quickly while at work
http://journals.pepublishing.com/con...625w730517ph5/
"11.5 per cent of pedestrians struck by large sport utility vehicles (SUVs) are killed, compared with 4.5 per cent of pedestrians struck by passenger cars. The design of the vehicle front-end structure has a substantial influence on injury outcome when pedestrians are struck by vehicles."
http://www.mrtraffic.com/suv.htm
"Statistics showed that if a small cars weighting less than 2,500 pounds is stuck in the side by a SUV, occupants of the car are 47 times more likely to die. By comparison, when a car hits another auto in the side there are six deaths in the car being hit for every one in the striking vehicle."
I ain't up on cages.
I see two sorts around. Some are called things like Mazda Bongo. They are obviously forward control vans with some seats in the back
others are called things like Estimas and look like station wagons with a serious obesity problem.
Which sort are we talking about?
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
Max has brought up a good point though. People such as himself can drive such large vehicles - and feel they are not in control of the vehicle.
Should there be a testing system to see if people can control such large moving objects.
Obviously it is not working very well - as he can still drive these death traps
snigger!!!
Max, you're applying exactly the same logic in your argument that ACC are using against motorbikes... i.e. that because you ride/drive vehicle X you are X% more likely to come a cropper... doesn't mean it's going to happen and you still have exactly the same 50/50 chance of an accident today that you did yesterday irrespective of the vehicle that you're driving/riding... throw in any other factor you choose, rain, ice, anything and you've still got a 50/50 chance of having an accident... that's just my take though!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
max PLEASE getcha facts straight. The most recent crash (this weekend ) wasn't a people mover it was a commercial type van.
Theres a big difference between a Hiace/bongo/l200/caravan VAN and the toyota previa/L300 spacegear et al.
In one case in an accident indeed the drivers legs are toast whereas the others have crumple zones like a car.
But then if you apply your logic then all commercial vans should also be banned.
To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks