Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Thread: Buying a bike you can't view?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    4th May 2006 - 22:17
    Bike
    1987 GPX 250
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    3,445
    People will happily buy a car with 100,000 on the clock but anything over 50,000 on a bike and people get scared. But im not complaining means i can pick up a cheap bike that performs the same as any other

  2. #17
    Join Date
    25th January 2007 - 21:37
    Bike
    2011 ER-6N
    Location
    Glenfield
    Posts
    2,888
    Quote Originally Posted by sil3ntwar View Post
    People will happily buy a car with 100,000 on the clock but anything over 50,000 on a bike and people get scared. But im not complaining means i can pick up a cheap bike that performs the same as any other
    That's because cars last a lot longer than bikes. Bikes last about half to a third as long.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    4th May 2006 - 22:17
    Bike
    1987 GPX 250
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    3,445
    Quote Originally Posted by Slyer View Post
    That's because cars last a lot longer than bikes. Bikes last about half to a third as long.
    Only because they get wrapped around solid objects. No reason why a bike engine can not last as long as a cars engine.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    25th January 2007 - 21:37
    Bike
    2011 ER-6N
    Location
    Glenfield
    Posts
    2,888
    Quote Originally Posted by sil3ntwar View Post
    Only because they get wrapped around solid objects. No reason why a bike engine can not last as long as a cars engine.
    Yes, there is. Low RPM engines last longer than high RPM engines.
    More revolutions = More wear

  5. #20
    Join Date
    4th May 2006 - 22:17
    Bike
    1987 GPX 250
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    3,445
    Quote Originally Posted by Slyer View Post
    Yes, there is. Low RPM engines last longer than high RPM engines.
    More revolutions = More wear
    Pfft take your logic and go away.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    22nd September 2009 - 22:02
    Bike
    2001 SV400s
    Location
    Sanson
    Posts
    451
    Quote Originally Posted by Slyer View Post
    Yes, there is. Low RPM engines last longer than high RPM engines.
    More revolutions = More wear
    Yeah, but theres no reason a car cant do half a million kms, or even a million... with regular services and replacement parts etc, and im not talking about re-builds either!

  7. #22
    Join Date
    17th July 2005 - 22:28
    Bike
    Dougcati, Geoff and Suzi
    Location
    Banjo town
    Posts
    10,162
    Quote Originally Posted by huff3r View Post
    Yeah, but theres no reason a car cant do half a million kms, or even a million... with regular services and replacement parts etc, and im not talking about re-builds either!
    That is true. I generally say the engineering tolerances help. But as proof to low revving, low stress engines I have tidied up a 34 Hudson Terraplane sedan [flat back] that has done a doccumented 658000 miles. Very impressive, original motor too!!!!!!!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Image003.jpg 
Views:	5 
Size:	141.8 KB 
ID:	151399  
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul in NZ View Post
    Ha...Thats true but life is full horrible choices sometimes Merv. Then sometimes just plain stuff happens... and then some more stuff happens.....




    Alloy, stainless and Ti polishing.
    Bling your bike out!
    PM me

  8. #23
    Join Date
    18th October 2009 - 10:00
    Bike
    1990 Yamaha FZR 250
    Location
    whakatane
    Posts
    82
    I guess its like everything its how you look after it you thrash a motor cold all the time it will take a a lot of life of it and depends how you treat it in general.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •