Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Govt to back off Levy increases!?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    18th December 2008 - 18:47
    Bike
    XV 535
    Location
    Epsomish
    Posts
    1,156
    Blog Entries
    2

    Govt to back off Levy increases!?

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/n...ectid=10609935

    Don't know what to make of this, it seems kinda two faced
    Quote Originally Posted by nodrog View Post
    you dont get 180+ hp out of 998cc by being nice to trees.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    9th October 2003 - 11:00
    Bike
    2022 BMW RnineT Pure
    Location
    yes
    Posts
    14,591
    Blog Entries
    3
    It is.

    Don't fall for it.
    If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?



  3. #3
    Join Date
    15th September 2005 - 09:55
    Bike
    Triumph Thruxton (09)
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    150
    I liked this bit...

    " Goatee beards were a popular fashion accessory, and nicknames like "Stoney", "Hawkeye" and "Wolfman" plentiful. "

    You're immortalised Brent ! I'm pissed they didn't include Modboy ! haha.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    1st April 2006 - 20:46
    Bike
    Cagiva Raptor 650, ZX-10R
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    1,135
    As I've said before, and Stoney expressed so well, the amount is immaterial. For many people, the cost of taking time off work, travel expenses etc coming for the Bikeoi exceeds the ACC levy for a few years!

    If it was justified and warranted, I would pay even more... It is the principle that we are arguing.

    Currently, ACC is a no faults system, and if they want to change that, then fine, apply it across the board, assess people's individual risk and charge people their ACC levy like an insurance company, open it up to competition.

    If not, it has to remain no faults for everyone.

    If we pay even 1 cent more than car owners (which we currently do), then it's saying, "ACC is a 'no faults' system, except for those damn bikers!! We'll screw them!" then tag on other groups which are next in line.
    .
    .
    "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

  5. #5
    Join Date
    15th September 2005 - 09:55
    Bike
    Triumph Thruxton (09)
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by Bend-it View Post

    If it was justified and warranted, I would pay even more... It is the principle that we are arguing.

    Currently, ACC is a no faults system, and if they want to change that, then fine, apply it across the board, assess people's individual risk and charge people their ACC levy like an insurance company, open it up to competition.

    If not, it has to remain no faults for everyone.
    Exactly right Bend-it !!

    I liked Goff's argument that old people fall over and need hip replacements - so should we hit them with a $500 annual levy. And we can include skateboarders, rugby players, runners, trampers, climbers, morris dancers, people that use vending machines, etc etc, then split it up by gender and race ... everyone's risk factors need to be assessed so that no single group is subsidising any other group.

    I believe we call this reductio ad absurdum

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •