
Originally Posted by
SPman
West Australia has mediocre roads. Large country (2,500,000 square km) relative to a small population (2,500,000) and we travel a lot (also, we allow large trucks to chew up the roads). But at least they stay intact in 45 degree heat without any bleed out! - They even survive bushfires. And the road outside our place is just a sealed gravel road, and it's fine - narrow sealed strip, but a good chip surface.
NZ and NZ ers are quite prepared to accept shitty second rate services and then complain about the cost! - it's cheaper to do it right the first time round!
Still no excuse for inferior surfaces though.
Yeah. But dozing a flat track through the sand and sprinkling a bit of lime on top is a tad less expensive than the reasonably serious teraforming required here. Leaves a fair wad of budget for surfacing yes?

Originally Posted by
shrub
Yes, that's all very well, but did anyone make a profit in those days? Of course not. Get real, good roads/services/infrastructure are a wonderful idea, but what's the point if nobody makes a profit?
Insert new sarcasm symbol here?
Seriously, if the costs were assigned according to the benefits the roads would be better and there'd be a deal less bitching.

Originally Posted by
rebel
Why blame trucks? They already pay more than their fair share for using the roads and fuck all get put back into it.
Simple, 'cause trucks is what fucks the roads. In fact trucks are responsible for so much of the damage it might as well be 100%. If trucks pay less than the total cost of road repairs they're getting a fucking good deal.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Bookmarks