
Originally Posted by
Armitage Shanks
Great Vid's mate and thanks, saw the VFR12 today for the first time in the shop and it look's pretty cool, indeed. 28k sounds a little steep though ( To put it mildly ) I was hoping Honda may have , for the money , generated a bit more of a 'Hyperbike ' .....but, never mind . 25K for a new ZX14 and only 20K for a new Hayabusa, can somebody explain the commercial logic behind the pricing here ?
Aside from that, here's my new girl ......Cheers ..
I was sitting on the dunny this morning reading a test of the new ZX14: it does appear that the VFR is taking aim fair and square at that. The ZX won "Best sprots tourer" in CW in 2008 and 2009, its been revised for '10, and Honda are gunning for it.
as to pricing: on RRP its a bit over ten percent difference between the 14 and the VFR: some of that is the NZ "Honda Premium" as I like to think of it: their (Honda) bikes are ten to fifteen percent too expensive for what they are, just because of the badge (IMO). but the VFR is all new, all singing, all dancing, and the 14 is revised. so manufacture costs of a new model vs an existing one though worked over.
Riddle me this: Honda want $20k for the CB1000F. It replaced the CB900 Hornet which was $11k: sure the CB is an all new bike, and by all accounts a good one, but why does that cost 20 large when a brand new from the contact patch up thing with all the lectrickery and a brand new motor (and V4s are expensive to produce) with full fairing, cost $28k? I just do not understand that.
Last edited by HenryDorsetCase; 18th February 2010 at 08:59.
Reason: english as a second language, it appears
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
Bookmarks