I wish the Evan's family all the best with the Inquest.
I have been advised in regards to our three family's upcoming part II of inquest that having a lawyer rep is of no further advantage and couldn't do more than you're able to do yourself, whether or not this is applicable here - I'm not sure.
However, seeking advise prior is a good thing.
Addressing the Evans family: You can represent yourselves/Dan, and submit any and all information and/or research regarded relevant, in terms of: How to prevent this tragedy from happening again.
You can only ask direct questions of witnesses on the day - who attend, that have made statements within the crash report as I understand it, whether you can invite outside or expert witnesses, that needs to be cleared with the Coroner (if you haven't already)
You can also list all questions and send to the coroners office prior to the inquest, so all questions will be covered where possible (again - if you haven't already) and of course add more on the day as witnesses step up and the process unfolds.
Simply put - the coroners court is not to determine blame, but to determine the findings of this crash, and prevention of another similar episode, publicise these findings, and the Coroner is now able to make recomendations at a Govt level (for want of better words)
My personal opinion, having gone through part I, is the only differences between having a lawyer represent or not, is money, and that they ask the questions, submit the info, and pick up details for more questions - if you're unable to.
Anyone and everyone within the family who attends is able to share the 'details' burden.
It is harrowing, but possibly a weight off - whichever way you go.
Again, Best wishes from our family, to yours.

Bookmarks