Sounds good to me Nordie. Springs and damping being set up for total race weight weight. This would mean that the static sag is probably just a good way of figuring out if the springs are right or not.
Sounds good to me Nordie. Springs and damping being set up for total race weight weight. This would mean that the static sag is probably just a good way of figuring out if the springs are right or not.
"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools." - Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)
= rider sag, or sag "all in". Wot I bin sayn all along.
The adjustment comes because the amount of the load sprung by the rider's legs changes. Dunno exactly why, that's just how "they" set bikes up. Suspect it is because while standing up (it's more obvious) the torso doesn't move as much as the bike; the legs flex between the load & the chassis in the same way the bike's suspension flexes between the chassis & wheels.
Mmmm, beer!
Cheers,
Colin
Originally Posted by Steve McQueen
is width a factor to the mathematical combination of numbers...
JMJ & 9FIDY
I FEEL THE NEED, THE NEED FOR SPEED
my ride picshttp://picasaweb.google.com/sueycarter
other ride pics http://picasaweb.google.com/113645336286831595353
so they will act like a wind spoiler to help hold the rear wheel on the ground with down force...when i reach maximum velocity...
I FEEL THE NEED, THE NEED FOR SPEED
my ride picshttp://picasaweb.google.com/sueycarter
other ride pics http://picasaweb.google.com/113645336286831595353
At last, despite the clowns, an answer that makes sense.
So, what this means is that the luggage is NOT part of the static sag.
Thanks Fran.
This gives me a means of quickly and exactly calculating the correct spring rate for the next big trip.
"Just riding it" isn't an option. Believe me, after 20,000 km and 85 million corrugations, half of which you can camp behind to shelter from the wind, if it ain't right, your arse is grass. The likelihood of a serious breakage goes up dramatically too.
As an aside, I ran into Ken MacIntosh at Motomail a while ago and had a really interesting discussion. He uses a drill press and a set of bathroom scales to measure spring rate - so simple and ingenious.
I may not be as good as I once was, but I'm as good once as I always was.
Just went out to the garage and poked both shocks (front and the other end) with a stick and niether of them sagged and I never got a static shockso the sprung vs unsprung wieght must be in balance with the power output of x squared by the root of the tree in the middle of the field 2 men plowed on a moonlight night.
I think![]()
Neil, remember that even the best suspension guru's like Robert or Paul Thede (Race Tech founder) acknowledge that their job is to set suspension up with "the least amount of compromise".
But their is always compromise. Don't fall into the trap of over thinking what the forks/shock are doing in an attempt to nullify every type of load factor.
What may be 95% tuned for ruts, will have you cursing as you go into soft sand etc
Just my opinion.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks