So if they were heading in the same direction and the tractor was in front wanting to turn right, bike is behind going straight ahead.... Are people saying that anyone turning right has to be thinking of what anyone behind them might be doing as well as watching for their opportunity from the front to execute their turn?
Yes, I know of the pull to the left "rule" to allow traffic behind you to pass, but I thought that was primarily if there is a string of oncoming vehicles preventing you from making your turn fairly well immediately. Was the tractor stationary, just sitting in the middle of the road for some time before being able to turn or was it in the process of turning when the motorcyclist hit him?
Either way it doesn't alter a death, but I'd be cautious before calling for the head of the tractor driver especially if he wasn't actually doing anything other that what he was legally entitled to do (turning into a driveway).
Do have to they register tractors, and do they pay ACC ?
Oh look, another KB shit fight about something none of you were there to witness!![]()
If I am on my bike, waiting at ANY intersection I am aware of what is behind me (especially as my son had the experience of being bumped into from behind while at an intersection recently while he was stationary). However if I'm in a fat arse truck or tractor I can hardly skippity skip out of the way just because I see another vehicle coming up from behind who seems to not have noticed my presence.
The question is whether any vehicle "hurtling towards you from behind" (your words, not mine) has the right to blame you for the ensuing crash if they hit you.
Before anyone reads that and thinks I'm "blaming" the rider for hitting the tractor, I am not. What I am questioning is why people are blaming the tractor driver when the law is pretty strict on the following motorist.
Ok it seems to me that you have read it all correctly and made your well calculated opinion of the events (unlike many here it would seem). In my opinion you have got it right.
The poor fella crossed the double yellow to go round the tractor as it was in fact about to turn into a driveway on the right hand side of the road. There would have been plenty of clear vision and plenty of last minute choices to be made.
My condolences to the family and friends.
Trumpydom!
Maybe we are feeling a tad annoyed with the tractor driver as from what i have read, he was turning right over double yellow lines - normally placed for a good reason?
But... despite this - a life has been lost, a family grieves, another comrade has gone too soon. For this, we must all take a moment to reflect.
Yes, tractors may registered, but the ACC is not charged to the vehicle licence. The ACC is paid from the farms normal ACC levies.
A tractor that can (or does) travel faster that 30km/hr is also required to have a WOF, but the law allows the tractor different standards - it is treated as a mobile machine, not a vehicle.
David must play fair with the other kids, even the idiots.
So, if your driveway out in the boondocks (or wherever for that matter) happened to be where there are double yellows you would have to either (1) relocate your drive entry/exit to a more appropriate segment of the road (any my guess is that possibly the driveway was there before the double yellows were painted, but i could be wrong) or (2) never go into your drive.
Interesting options.
Depends on a whole lot of other factors. It is a fairly common type of crash, but blame doesn't always fall with the turning vehicle, or the following one, because there are always other issues that contributed to it happening.
And totally impractical. People turn right across single and double yellow lines every day. I have yet to see anyone charged for it.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks