....i reiterate my previous post....no.....
Mmmm...understood but its easy to cast serious aspersions on the internet which other people might be influenced by.
Saying that the present government which includes the Maori Party is complicit in corruption, excluding minorities, nepotism etc is strong stuff. Very easy to say but you need to back it up. With respect, why say it if you cannot draw specific and consistent examples?
you have no idea of what your talking about.........
marginalized societies often form their own rules , ... and they may not be white and/or middle class.....
go on,,, please challenge what I have said , as the explanation will show , the mess NZ is in due to the apathy and sheer stupidity of white mite class puritans
Stephen
btw the reply will be Monday as I am in meetings all day tomorrow ( Sunday)
"Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."
"Look, Madame, where we live, look how we live ... look at the life we have...The Republic has forgotten us."
Whats to challenge, you haven't said anything....
We know that a portion of our society choose not to live by our accepted standards, its in the paper on a constant basis.
Its why we have jails.
I can see your reply coming from miles away, sure, there is a validity in ignoring the action and looking at the conditions that contributed to in order to try and stop it happening again but its an evil to society to remove a persons responsibility for their actions and the actions of their parents.
To fix a problem you need to take ownership of it, ownership of the act and the consequences. This is the very place that Maori leadership should stand up as the proud people they claim to be and lead ffs.
Anyone blaming the rest of society is contributing to the problem, even if there is much that can be (and should be) down in the extended community.
I'm thinking a dip in an acid tank for every piece of scum that beats a child.
And now I await your pompous convoluted conceited reply. I of course will have no idea if you have any idea of what you are talking about, you generally speak from so deep within your own anus its impossible to tell.
If the Nats wanted to focus on the economy maybe they would have turned up for a few more radio interviews and answer some of the media questions about policy:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10767255
I believe the correct term is "had". It was nicked, I understand.
Redefining slow since 2006...
As I indicated, these are 'veteran role models'.
I feel confident that for as long as you have been interested in politics you would have been aware of the plethora of examples in the popular press, both historical and current.
The prospective sale of irreplaceable state owned assets, and the given reasons for such a sale, could easily be considered an example.
Previous sales have become cash cows for the new owners and, if historical energy costs were used as a forecaster of future pricing, they have not delivered the cost savings so wildly trumpeted. Their dividends have become part of the 15Billion dollars a year flooding out of this country.
Security of energy supply, security of food and water supply are paramount objectives for any govt. committed to making the people of their country better off.
Security of natural assets is also hugely important. If you take the examples of Chile and Jamaica one can see what happens to countries who lose control of their assets.
In Chile Kennacot Copper controlled the copper production. Allende came to power pledging to make the wealth of the country for the people of the country. The Yanks ousted him and put Gen. Pinochet in power. Good move?
Much like the Australian example where Goff Whitlam said " the wealth of Australia should be for Australians". They got rid of him too.
In Jamaica the wealth of the country and most of the land has been 'acquired' by multi-national corporations.
Despite the abundance of natural wealth the Jamaican people are desperately poor.
In NZ, 30 years ago, 4/5ths of the Taranaki province was owned by foreigners. Arguably the greatest dairying area in NZ. The industry that provides the majority of our income. This is an example of a slide down the greasy path which the current talk of misappropriation of NZ assets is now poised upon.
An indicator that this is a con job must surely be the constant changing of reasons and excuses for the sales.
These assets are our heritage and should be our legacy.
Atheism and Religion are but two sides of the same coin.
One prefers to use its head, while the other relies on tales.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks