Wasn't an election issue. But Democracy is more than voting for gubbermint every 4 years. Unfortunately many don't know this.
I didn't really understand it either until I went to communist china. Now I do.......I see massive issues with the way we implement democracy in NZ.
As for the nothing doing something. Nah not that stupid, I know nothing does nothing. But I now ask you to question if voting actually does anything?
Or is it SSDD?
Industry in NZ is light years ahead of the poor ol' government.
People in NZ are light years ahead of the poor ol' government.
So what should we do to change this? Bit of paper doesn't seem to do it, people have been doing it here for a while.
As stated earlier, I would rather things were fixed smartly now - rather than violently later. Because people won't be "non-voters" or "lazy vote whatever voters" forever.
Eventually the penny with drop. And people will be fed up.
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
yet that's what they've been doing the past few years, cutting services, merging departments, becoming "more efficient" etc... it certainly hasn't stopped them trying... tis a shame that under those circumstances, tis the non dead wood that bails. Granted that's a generalisation, but no-one likes working under the threat of losing their job and if they're any way competent, they'll bail... meanwhile to dole Q rises, people lose their livelihoods, houses, undergo family stresses etc... fuck I hate the byproduct of cutting the "dead wood".
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Ummm ... it's every three years actually ... (here in NZ anyway ... did you not know that ???)
Doing nothing means somebody else does it for you. NOT necessarily the way YOU want it done.
Not only did registered voters NOT vote in their thousands ... eligible voters did not register in the thousands as well ...
And if you think ALL those people NOT voting ... does NOTHING ... will make NO CHANGE to the political system of OUR goverment ... perhaps you are that stupid.
Blank ballot papers and incorrectly filled ones are recorded only as INVALID votes and are not/do not ... count towards the final outcome.
I beg to differ ... Industry is reliant on goverment policy for survival and are usually only interested in making a profit. With only the interests of their own company on their mind.
Considering the result ... and the number of those that didn't register to vote, and those that did ... but didn't vote ... There are a LOT of people in NZ (far to many) that have no bloody idea ...
If everybody that could ... and should vote ... the change might be quite radical ...
A goverment the way the MAJORITY want ...
When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
Only if you work on the principal things get done. I have experienced the opposite. If you don't do it. Doesn't get done. If the government doesn't have 100% of the peoples support.....why do we fill the house?
If I don't have 100% of the resources behind me.......I usually am not allowed to do things.
Sad to hear about people not enrolling. But I guess people live busy lives so I can see where that is coming from.
Your 100% correct about non-votes not counting in the current system. As mentioned earlier - I have always stated that I know they are wasted. But my concern is that what if this ignored data is actually hiding a bigger problem in NZ.
I would like to live in a New Zealand that addressed problems. My ancestors had that. They got stuff like voting for women etc.
Are you saying that 1/4 of NZ not voting is not a problem?
I really suggest you investigate this further. What you have described is actually the NZ government. NZ industry has an element of this - but contrary to popular belief.......they are actually make moves well before the NZ Govt discusses them.
Not saying they are angels. But just saying - NZ govt isn't exactly doing us many favours lately.
Yeah that will fix it.
VOTE DAMN YOU! THEN WE ALL GET THE GOVT WE WANT! MAJORITY WINS!
Because democracy is all about compulsory voting, forcing govt rule upon us.
As mentioned earlier. I see a problem. I don't see compulsory voting being the silver bullet. There are reasons why people don't vote - until we address the problems you can scream red and blue until the cows come home.
What next put a gun to peoples head until they vote? How democratic.
What if they had the option to vote for no government? Would you accept that % as legitimate.
There is a problem. It needs to be addressed. If it doesn't my son's generation could end up hiding in their homes as people 'vote' in the street.
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
'Cos we're not smart enough.
TINA mark 2, absolutely, it is on the way.
That is the single biggest failing of the National government of the past few years, and not only will no-one hold them to account for it, they are still widely regarded as the best economic managers, and Labour regarded as the big borrowing party...
So, they're Keynesians? Weird, but OK let's go with that. What did they spend the extra borrowing on, and how well did it stimulate the economy? Are we back to solid growth yet?
I'm not, I suspect it will look a lot like fascism.
Why? They have been elected (or not, as the case may be), job done. I note Te Greens are the main people calling for an inquiry into the low turnout.
I think you malign them needlessly - they are actually pretty balanced. Just look left by comparison to the other partisan hacks.
Come off it, they were all over Labour for their costings (rightly) but little challenge for the Nats' numbers. I suspect they don't harass the Greens much because everyone else does it for them. And ACT is extreme.
Good observation. So, perhaps running a country like a company is a dumb idea? Perhaps someone should tell the Nats and their voters.
No, I think he has it right. Most successful NZ businesses have heavy state involvement in their early history, and there is no better way to build an industry sector than to prop it up with government support. There is little incentive for the business sector to build risky enterprises all on their own when governments are around to help them get started (and flog them the working project at the end - assuming it's a winner). The ethics of this are parlous of course, but it's commonplace.
Redefining slow since 2006...
Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
[QUOTE=avgas;1130207644] ... If the government doesn't have 100% of the peoples support.....why do we fill the house?
If I don't have 100% of the resources behind me.......I usually am not allowed to do things. [QUOTE]
Because it's a MAJORITY rules system.
By 100% of resources ... do you mean finances ... ???
Not to busy to moan if things dont turn out the way they want though ...
Perhaps if enough people spoke to their elected MP (regardless if it was the one they voted for) and rasised the issues with him/her ... problems may be addressed ... easier just to moan LOUDLY ...
If NZ industry make moves that are contradiction to goverment policy/principals/intentions ... goverment changes the rules ... but light years ahead ... I wouldn't say that at all.
NZ industry is always looking for the lawful loophole that can give them the edge, over the rest in their line of business ... (ie: The competition)
Apart from the fact voting is NOT comulsory ... (but it IS compulsory to be registered to vote ... by law) .... Democracy IS about the MAJORITY. Majority gives mandate ... (apparently)
Just that the single minded, self-centered, ass-holes (MOST of whom didn't vote) want the goverment (or MP) to do more for them... or want the rules changed (to suit THEM more)![]()
Incentive to vote ... (1000 fly-buy points awarded to EACH registered voter ... 10,000 to EACH that ACTUALLY voted ... then watch the fun come election day ...![]()
RECORD 100% voter turnout (ok .... 98.9 %) I bet ...
The simple fact is the GOVERMENT is just as much a BUSINESS ... as ANY in the private sector ... it stands to reason ... SOMEBODY must be in charge. MP's are heads of department .. or at least "office managers" and as such ... responsible to the CEO (Prime Minister)
Those that believe that it "wont matter" if they dont vote ... think of the 25% that didn't vote (give or take a few %) with votes of 5 % required to get a PARTY seat into Goverment ... FIVE PARTY seats were WASTED ... (to use a popular term.)![]()
When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
Doubtless of some interest but that's what internal polling close to the next election is for, A lot can change in 3 years.
Save me from the empty managerialism... That there are parallels between business and government does not mean they are identical.
Redefining slow since 2006...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks