View Poll Results: Change the Give way Rule?

Voters
144. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    91 63.19%
  • No

    40 27.78%
  • Stop asking me i dont care

    13 9.03%
Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 150

Thread: Should we be changing the Give Way rule? (POLL)

  1. #46
    Join Date
    7th November 2011 - 13:01
    Bike
    CBR600 F4, GT650, GT250R
    Location
    Palmerston North
    Posts
    298
    Quote Originally Posted by Scuba_Steve View Post
    If it helps I do work with alot of older people who have experience both the overseas & old/new rule who do agree with my view, in-fact more would have the current kept then not by a large margin
    That's unusual? Most old people don't care for the status quo and want everything changed to a new way because they are very adaptable and comfortable with change and not set in their ways at all. They are forever banging on about changing the flag, becoming a republic, and especially how music now is so much better than it was in 'their day'.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by Scuba_Steve View Post
    "when in Rome"
    Nah. Not when it's just a bone-head,WTF, idiotic rule.

    Stop your chariot so a pleb can turn in front of the gladiator in front of you?
    Not likely, Sparticus.

  3. #48
    Join Date
    2nd December 2009 - 13:51
    Bike
    A brmm, brmm one
    Location
    Upper-Upper Hutt
    Posts
    2,153
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
    Nah. Not when it's just a bone-head,WTF, idiotic rule.
    logically I call the old/new rule that, it makes little to no logical sense, and I can only see it retarding traffic flow.
    But my final decision will wait till post 2nd year, after all the "I can't deal with change" fuckups should be out da way & we're just back to regular "can't drive" fuckups
    Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance
    "Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk

  4. #49
    Join Date
    5th December 2009 - 12:32
    Bike
    Yes
    Location
    Yes
    Posts
    3,284
    Who cares.

    It is changing. Half the people on the road can't work out the existing rule. Half won't understand the new one. Ride accordingly and you'll be sweet. Personally I'll be glad to be able to turn left and not have to wait for the dick wanting to turn right to hesitate and faff around when I've got a shorter distance to go and could get around with holding him up anyway.

    Anyone who parks the bike up when the rule changes shouldn't be riding anyway.

  5. #50
    Join Date
    10th January 2012 - 10:27
    Bike
    RF900
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    174
    Its a land slide!

  6. #51
    Join Date
    10th January 2012 - 10:27
    Bike
    RF900
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    174
    Lets see if we can get 100 votes

  7. #52
    Join Date
    17th December 2011 - 09:01
    Bike
    ---2000 Triumph SprintT
    Location
    Manawatu
    Posts
    256
    To each his own and all that..but for the life of me - I just can't see why anyone biker or cager, would want to keep the stupid rule that is in place now that means we need eyes looking at our rears to see if traffic is approaching behind before we make a decision to turn left or give way to right turning traffic. How do u guys KNOW that the car behind you is not going to flick on his L indicator the very moment you avert your eyes from him..causing the cager to right turn on top of you as you assume you have the left turn right? Nah. Get rid of it.
    Or,...sees you in a cage stuck behind another who wants to turn left and u want to go ahead....in a shared turn and straight ahead lane....waiting, waiting,,...

  8. #53
    Join Date
    10th January 2012 - 10:27
    Bike
    RF900
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    174
    Quote Originally Posted by Trade_nancy View Post
    To each his own and all that..but for the life of me - I just can't see why anyone biker or cager, would want to keep the stupid rule that is in place now that means we need eyes looking at our rears to see if traffic is approaching behind before we make a decision to turn left or give way to right turning traffic. How do u guys KNOW that the car behind you is not going to flick on his L indicator the very moment you avert your eyes from him..causing the cager to right turn on top of you as you assume you have the left turn right? Nah. Get rid of it.
    Or,...sees you in a cage stuck behind another who wants to turn left and u want to go ahead....in a shared turn and straight ahead lane....waiting, waiting,,...
    Thanks for you comment and vote.

  9. #54
    Join Date
    1st November 2005 - 08:18
    Bike
    F-117.
    Location
    Banana Republic of NZ
    Posts
    7,048
    Quote Originally Posted by merv View Post
    The other thing I'd like to see is a "left turn on red" rule similar to the "right turn on red" rule in USA but of course mirror image. In that case you stop at a red light - look - if no traffic you then proceed to make your turn hassle free.
    Totally agree on that one Merv. On quiet days I do exactly that, Sunday morning especially, since there are quite a few sets of lights strategically positioned to stuff-up the traffic flow up this way.
    Come to a complete stop, then check for traffic.

    I doubt that we will ever see it happen in NZ though.
    TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”

  10. #55
    Join Date
    21st December 2010 - 10:40
    Bike
    Kate
    Location
    Kapiti Commute
    Posts
    2,832
    Quote Originally Posted by Swoop View Post
    Totally agree on that one Merv. On quiet days I do exactly that, Sunday morning especially, since there are quite a few sets of lights strategically positioned to stuff-up the traffic flow up this way.
    Come to a complete stop, then check for traffic.

    I doubt that we will ever see it happen in NZ though.
    They have discussed it but then backed away. Suspect they look at comments like those on this site on how bad NZ drivers are and figure we couldn't handle it.

  11. #56
    Join Date
    1st November 2005 - 08:18
    Bike
    F-117.
    Location
    Banana Republic of NZ
    Posts
    7,048
    Quote Originally Posted by oneofsix View Post
    They have discussed it but then backed away. Suspect they look at comments like those on this site on how bad NZ drivers are and figure we couldn't handle it.
    They would be correct with 99.9% of kiwi drivers.
    TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”

  12. #57
    Join Date
    21st December 2010 - 10:40
    Bike
    Kate
    Location
    Kapiti Commute
    Posts
    2,832
    Quote Originally Posted by Swoop View Post
    They would be correct with 99.9% of kiwi drivers.
    I understand the sentiment and know we use those sort of figures as generalizations but whilst we aren't the worlds best we are also not really that bad. There is a low percentage that stuff it up for the rest of us. As a general rule I think we could handle it.

  13. #58
    Join Date
    13th March 2003 - 11:47
    Bike
    2006 Honda XR250L
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    7,355
    Quote Originally Posted by Trade_nancy View Post
    To each his own and all that..but for the life of me - I just can't see why anyone biker or cager, would want to keep the stupid rule that is in place now that means we need eyes looking at our rears to see if traffic is approaching behind before we make a decision to turn left or give way to right turning traffic. How do u guys KNOW that the car behind you is not going to flick on his L indicator the very moment you avert your eyes from him..causing the cager to right turn on top of you as you assume you have the left turn right? Nah. Get rid of it.
    Or,...sees you in a cage stuck behind another who wants to turn left and u want to go ahead....in a shared turn and straight ahead lane....waiting, waiting,,...
    Man of my own heart - good on ya
    Cheers

    Merv

  14. #59
    Join Date
    11th April 2010 - 23:17
    Bike
    Suzuki S50
    Location
    Shed
    Posts
    162
    Blog Entries
    1
    [QUOTE=merv;1130241764

    The current stupid give way when turning left rule causes so much hesitation and uncertainty. You indicate your left turn - the driver wanting to turn right in front of you has to hesitate in case the driver behind you decides there is room to pull out and pass you and must be given way to, and you have to hesitate in case the right turning driver can pull around in front of you, but then you feel pissed off when the driver behind goes on past you and you stopped unnecessarily. All a total pain in the arse and every step of uncertainty raises a a risk point when a stuff up by anyone is lilely to increase the risk of collision.

    The old way (not the current way), about to become the new way (and therefore current way), is about as sensible as it gets in my view.

    [/QUOTE] Couldnt have said it better. The new T intersection rule also makes alot of sense.

  15. #60
    Join Date
    12th July 2003 - 01:10
    Bike
    Royal Enfield 650 & a V8 or two..
    Location
    The Riviera of the South
    Posts
    14,068
    Can't be naffed reading through all the crap on this thread but does anybody know a reason the law was changed to its present status way back??
    Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........
    " Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •