
Originally Posted by
DrunkenMistake
I agree on this part, I have found riding a larger capacity bike more comfortable and alot more of a confident boost on highway riding even just in amongst traffic, When I had my 250, I done a trip to Blenheim and back, With a speedo error.. I made really good time, Bit overtaking was slow and difficult, and riding on a bike that size for that length of time started getting painful 90% of they way through,
Im yet to do a trip of that size on a larger bike, But I done a 300km trip on my 400 and I did get sore wrists but that seems to be common with the VFR's Iv only done a 200km trip in one go on the 650, and both bikes even on the smaller trips have been alot nicer to be on for a long period, made it a much more enjoyable trip, and I guess over taking isnt nessocery and opening the throttle isnt everyones cup of Tea,
Even if those two bikes were restricted as such, they would still be more comfortable and confident building, this is my opinion mind you having done 80% of my bike licenses on a 250cc + bike, Cruisers might be an entirely different story im not sure I have only ridden sports bikes.
That really comes under the 'horses for courses' heading...
I can think of several 600cc plus machines I would not even want to travel 10km's on by choice. Some 250's are disgustingly small and cramped. Althought the Hyo 250 is a 'big one' it's still a 'crouched riding position'... An older ZZR/GPX 250 are far more upright. I gather also the VT had some difference in riding position? Xelvis etc seem to have a slightly mnore upright position, or is that just an optical illusion?
My ZZR has bar risers, and I would not be happy leaning any further forwards that that. You can alter most bikes riding positions to some degree.
If the road to hell is paved with good intentions; and a man is judged by his deeds and his actions, why say it's the thought that counts? -GrayWolf
Bookmarks