How long is a Restricted Speed Sign 'supposed' to be in place after the completion of roadworks? ( untill the local cops have their quota's? )
This road was sealed last week, has been cleared of loose chips. I could understand a 70kph restriction in place untill roadmarkings are painted, but this is a back road that doesn't have shoulder lines, just a center line. There are three stretches of repaired surfaces, all with 30kph signs at both ends.
" Rule books are for the Guidance of the Wise, and the Obedience of Fools"
I would suspect that this is one of the many cases where either a TMP hasn't been approved by the roading authority, or has been ignored by the contractors.
Read my post!! I was asking how long a tempary sign should be left up after roadworks.
I read your post.
The Police have nothing to do with the placing or removal of signs, so shove the quota comment up your.............no, forget I said that, feeling a bit sensitive.
48 hours after the seal is down, I think. I attended a course a few years ago and woke up long enough to hear someone say 48 hours.
How long is a Restricted Speed Sign 'supposed' to be in place after the completion of roadworks? ( untill the local cops have their quota's? )
This road was sealed last week, has been cleared of loose chips. I could understand a 70kph restriction in place untill roadmarkings are painted, but this is a back road that doesn't have shoulder lines, just a center line. There are three stretches of repaired surfaces, all with 30kph signs at both ends.
It depends on quite a few things, there is no fixed timeframe. If you think they should be removed and it is a shitty back road then the chances are the contractors have forgotten them. Ring the council and they will tell you either a) they are up for this reason for another x days or b) the contractor should have taken them down and they will get on to them. If it is a 30 speed limit and there is no apparent reason, and no cones or other traffic management after a week then I would say it is the latter.
It depends on quite a few things, there is no fixed timeframe. If you think they should be removed and it is a shitty back road then the chances are the contractors have forgotten them. Ring the council and they will tell you either a) they are up for this reason for another x days or b) the contractor should have taken them down and they will get on to them. If it is a 30 speed limit and there is no apparent reason, and no cones or other traffic management after a week then I would say it is the latter.
Thanks for your reply. The road had been re sealed last week, and 30k's seemed excessively slow. As jellywrestler says, maybe there needs to be a period for the seal to harden before receiveing the full impact of high speeds.
Which brings up another question, why do we get so much tar melting on both old and new sealing?
" Rule books are for the Guidance of the Wise, and the Obedience of Fools"
The Police have nothing to do with the placing or removal of signs, so shove the quota comment up your.............no, forget I said that, feeling a bit sensitive.
There there, he didn't mean any upset. But his comment was fair enough. Be they temporary, necessary or no, those speed signs are legal as/when displayed and provide a wealth of opportunities for those of your profession (whether you/your colleagues DO anything is another matter)...
Originally Posted by rastuscat
48 hours after the seal is down, I think. I attended a course a few years ago and woke up long enough to hear someone say 48 hours.
I think it's 48 days round these parts. Honestly...
I've seen the 30 temp signs out for a patch of repair that was left of the left wheel track (ie the lane edge marking), where the repair was not mint fresh and had obviously been completed some days before. Signs were still out 5 WEEKS later. This is on HW50, a popular and well-travelled 100kph road.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
There there, he didn't mean any upset. But his comment was fair enough. Be they temporary, necessary or no, those speed signs are legal as/when displayed and provide a wealth of opportunities for those of your profession (whether you/your colleagues DO anything is another matter)....
There was a period, seems to have quietly disappeared, where there was a rule that it the temp sign was up when it shouldn't be the contractor could end up the one wearing the fine but can no longer find any ref to it on NZTA. Wish they would bring it back cause at the moment, with sooo many of them being misplaced jokes, people are no longer taking any of them serious, thus placing the workmen at risk. As per your example quoted below.
Originally Posted by MSTRS
I've seen the 30 temp signs out for a patch of repair that was left of the left wheel track (ie the lane edge marking), where the repair was not mint fresh and had obviously been completed some days before. Signs were still out 5 WEEKS later. This is on HW50, a popular and well-travelled 100kph road.
Now the next time you see a 30k sign and a patch on the shoulder it would be natural to ignore the sign but this time there may actually be someone working just up the road and the sign not be related to the patch at all.
Getting one ticket for blasting through a dumb sign like the one in the quote just reinforces the scam attitude but of course rustuscat and so wouldn't do that now would they? Well rustuscat might not but ... on takes one
Last edited by oneofsix; 1st February 2012 at 07:49.
Reason: forgot the popcorn
Now the next time you see a 30k sign and a patch on the shoulder it would be natural to ignore the sign but this time there may actually be someone working just up the road and the sign not be related to the patch at all.
Yes this has already happen with no passing lines.
Once upon-a-time they meant "Even if you are sure you can see, you can't - there is something obscuring your vision of on coming traffic so don't pass"
And I took them seriously.
Now they are everywhere, used just to ensure everyone travels at the speed of the lowest common denominator.
This ensures higher traffic densities, higher accident rates and the resultant increase in funding that the NZTA get.
So now, yellow lines mean check for cops, use your own judgment, pass if you think its safe.
David must play fair with the other kids, even the idiots.
Now the next time you see a 30k sign and a patch on the shoulder it would be natural to ignore the sign but this time there may actually be someone working just up the road and the sign not be related to the patch at all.
I mostly ignore those signs as a matter of course. I am not oblivious to the fact that there is just the speed sign - no cones, no 'men working' signs, no contractor vehicles. Observation and commonsense tells me that, barring some rozzer 'hiding in the bushes' there is no need to slow down.
The utter stupidity of such speed signs was brought home to me one fine evening on SH5. One section after another with 30kph repair zones where there was nothing but completed reseals, and patched bits off to the side, that appeared to have been swept already - and then, what do we have here? A 70kph sign. Best ignore that too, eh? Wrong!! Deep, uncompacted base coarse, rocks as big as your fist, spread over a torn up section several hundred metres long across both lanes. How the hell does that work? 30kph for nothing, 70kph for something that could kill. Fuckers...
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
Bookmarks