Car driver and bike drivers will always do stupid things, make an error of judgement etc atfer all they are human, but in a car vs motorcyle accident the motorcyclist always comes off worse no matter who was at fault. Seems some just don't get that.
Car driver and bike drivers will always do stupid things, make an error of judgement etc atfer all they are human, but in a car vs motorcyle accident the motorcyclist always comes off worse no matter who was at fault. Seems some just don't get that.
I mentioned vegetables once, but I think I got away with it...........
So you think KBers would serve up lectures (for fucking up) to riders who got squished between front and rear bumpers of cars, and that it is possible to maintain prescribed following distances (1 car length for every 10 kph) without cars constantly cutting in front of you and reducing that following distance?
I think you two have got a large dose of the PKB's.
Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.
Nothing will change what happened to that rider. What can change is other peoples awareness if it is pointed out that something like this can be avoided by being more aware of your surroundings. It may also benefit the involved rider the next time they are. No harm can come of this, other than some peoples feelings being hurt.
On your second point, I don't know the roads you ride on but I find no problem maintaining a safe distance without cars cutting in on me 'constantly'. Sure it happens but it also happens when I'm in my car. Doesn't mean I'm going to increase my chances of being in an accident by following at an unsafe distance just so cars can't cut in. That's just stupid logic. Honestly.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
Why is it we are discussing lane splitting but you now have to include riding in any condition to vent about the so called KB cocks giving a lecture? mate I would consider myself one of those aforementioned 'cocks'. Sometimes, just sometimes, said cocks have a wealth of experience or incidents to base their 'lectures' on. As Scummy has pointed out and I attempted to, you can be as right as right can be,, and you can stick to being 'in the right'... you are on the most vulnerable piece of motorised equipment on the road, you'll be DEAD RIGHT!!
Sometimes 'cowardice' IS the best defence, but then what do old fuckers like me know? jack shit I guess, we are too old to know it all.
If the road to hell is paved with good intentions; and a man is judged by his deeds and his actions, why say it's the thought that counts? -GrayWolf
Totally agree. Scanning and not looking at the wheel still wouldn't help. Because it was such a short amount of time and at the speed the bike was travelling, I would be my believe, that by the time the rider engaged his brain (for he is mere mortal and not a jet fighter) and reacted he still would have gone splat.
As you know, scanning is a very short look. By the time you're looking at something else, your brain is processing what it looked at previously. I don't even think an Indian (who are well known for their crazy wide field of vision) would have spotted the wheel in time and stopped.
Meh, it's all trivial really. The rider was a toser, the driver was a toser. No one gives a shit about anyone else anymore and everyone drives like fuck-tards, even the good ones.![]()
And I to my motorcycle parked like the soul of the junkyard. Restored, a bicycle fleshed with power, and tore off. Up Highway 106 continually drunk on the wind in my mouth. Wringing the handlebar for speed, wild to be wreckage forever.
- James Dickey, Cherrylog Road.
TAG: Expert Opinion At Large.
And I to my motorcycle parked like the soul of the junkyard. Restored, a bicycle fleshed with power, and tore off. Up Highway 106 continually drunk on the wind in my mouth. Wringing the handlebar for speed, wild to be wreckage forever.
- James Dickey, Cherrylog Road.
No the third option? let 'Darwinism' take it's course.....
Seriously though Ocean,
if some wont be 'educated' and some will not accept a level of personal responsibility for their choices and how they affect others on the road; (really that is the crux of any argument over road rules) then TPTB are going to step in with a heavy handed approach.
There are so many on the road bike/car/truck who really believe they are 'superior drivers' and wont get 'caught out' often they are 'right', they leave the trail of carnage behind them. We can all be honest that anyone with a bike enjoys a twisty road ridden quickly and often will 'errrrrr' bend the speed limit. The other side of the coin is when you see a bike overtaking at 150+ k's. Yes I know modern brakes, bike performance etc do mechanically allow for this level of manouvere. Reality is it's way too fast for the roads you are on, they aren't constructed for that level of speed. Most 'behaviour' is ego driven rather than skill or ability based and we have ALL done it. Yes a sprot bike can accelerate to 100k's in sub 3 seconds, and reach 160 in under 10 easily. My ZZR will do that, and will crucify my MT-01 in that area of performance, however.. top gear 'roll on' from 80-100k's to overtake? bye bye Zed, the MT is quicker in the 'usable' speed range without dropping 1 or 2 cogs. 90% plus of riders CANNOT get the 'best performance' out of a 1000cc sprot bike on the road, they scream down the straights, slam on brakes, slow right down, then scream onto the next bend...... I watch on the Taka's as a sprot bike rider overtakes on the double solid lines approaching the often blind next bend, yes the bike can do it, but?????
If the road to hell is paved with good intentions; and a man is judged by his deeds and his actions, why say it's the thought that counts? -GrayWolf
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks