I'm a Dad and I have a KDX 200, son had a 2000 XR 200, too soft and underbraked for me...but a good weekend trail ride all rounder. He now has the KDX and I just bought an old XR 400, bit taller but much the same as the XR 200 and better brakes, suspension, power.
where the heck is Nordeboy? He'd be all over this.
HOW DARE YOU SAY I HAVE A BIG PIPE
Sometimes I ride Slow, sometimes I Ride Quick, But When its Time To Get Busy Out The Hat Comes The Trick.
I own or have owned the XR250 models 1985, 1992 (bored to 285) 1995 and the 1987 XR200
I used them just as you propose to, trail riding, following the kids and the occasional hard out big rocks & tussock bashing runs, All have been bullet proof.
The 1984-1985s suffered from finickety carb adjustment and overheating, I threw on an oil cooler and switched to a single carb and it went fine.
I havent clocked up huge ks on them, but 90% has been off road and i love being able to park them up for months on end, then pull it out, couple of kicks and away you go. At $1500 - $3000 for a reasonable one they are exceptional value for money, ease of servicing and parts are also attractive to me?
Anything post 1990 should be a reasonable ride. It the budget allows it, later is better.
There is a noticeable step up from the 200 - 250 not just in power, but ride as well.
I would be inclined to say ttr too, or maybe a klx300. I'd tend to spend a little more on the bike so theres more time riding and less time looking for parts and fixing stuff. Also nothing like modern bikes when it comes to suspension and brakes, a small amount of additional investment will pay off in enjoyment and reliability imo.
Try to be the person your dog thinks you are
Ok heres another qustion for you whats the CRF230 like compared to the xr range, this bike in no way is about to replace my 450 Husaburg but will still be ridden by all
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks