What is missing in this dispute is comprehensive information from the Maritime Union of New Zealand explaining their position. Yes the POA have an effective media presence and employ advisors. But we are far from the days of cloth-capped trade unionists.
There are many well-educated left-wing activists (most of the Labour Party) who are able to put together slick media presentations. Matt McCarten and Leila Hare come to mind, John Minto, plenty of Green activists too.
Seriously, why haven't we seen a barrage of pro-union advertisements and interviews putting their point of view. I haven't even seen a rebuttal of the average $91,000 wage. Surely if that is untrue it is easy to disprove.
And the mayor - Len Brown?? He's been affiliated with the Labour Party since he was 17 yr old. For goodness sake if any politician has sympathy with the workers and could intervene its him. At the very least he could stand on their side if they are being genuinely oppressed.
Come to think of it, where's the Labour Leader in all this?
Ok fair enough, Len Brown offered to mediate: good on him. That's something but far far too late given this dispute has been publicly known about for 6 weeks and probably brewing for 3 months. I'd have thought Len would have jumped in when Fonterra moved their work to Tauranga weeks ago.
Lets go back to basics: the shareholders of POA are the ratepayers of Auckland. POA used to be listed on the sharemarket but the council bought up all of the shares. That makes POA a type of state owned enterprise.
So the Council can call a shareholders meeting, make resolutions requiring the directors to keep the waterfront guys on and resolve the dispute. Or the council can fire them and appoint new directors who will do that.
I have no time for Len Brown as he is a wimp, but clearly even he can see that the strikers are out of order. Had Banksie still been Mayor he would have stated his position very quickly and very clearly.
Auckland has had some dreadful mayors, including more recently that guy that makes breakfast cereals out of wood shavings. Also a lefty.
Last edited by Robert Taylor; 15th March 2012 at 06:22.
LOL not really. Trade unions have played a crucial part in the development of our society and social democracy is the norm in most OECD countries. Its amusing to watch American politics where they debate universal healthcare when its not even discussed in the rest of the developed world.
It's uncertain whether the current strikes are the last gasp of the union movement or perhaps a resurgence.
Very much so. The laws and regulations around all this are rather convoluted and not what the average joe would think....I think you need to read up about the entity that is the Ports of Auckland plus how the legislation surrounding it affects the Mayor's power of intervention etc.
the definition of "Council-Controlled Organisation" in the Local Government Act specifically excludes port companies:(4) The following entities are not council-controlled organisations: ...
(c) a port company or subsidiary of a port company within the meaning of the Port Companies Act 1988
Why is this the case?
The provision seems to have originally been introduced into the Local Government Act 1974 by the Local Government Amendment Act (No 2) 1989, which introduced new provisions about "Local Authority Trading Enterprises (LATES)", which specifically excluded port companies. The reason for that? Because the then-Labour government ofRoger DouglasDavid Lange wanted local bodies to sell their ports.
“- He felt that his whole life was some kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.”
Yes, we seem to have dredged up memories of the 70s with this current union activity. Certainly there is no argument that there was a time when unions were 100% needed to achieve some balance. But the flipside is when they have held countries to ransom and disrupted the smooth flow of many other industries. It is certain that at times they were taking direction from their communist mates.
With respect to the USA that place is now such a basket case that it should be renamed North Mexico.
No I dont think I'm biased. Its worked out really good for me personally but its made it hard for young people born here to get jobs. While its easy to say someone is set in their ways its a lot harder to explain to a bank manager about your casual employment situation when you want a mortgage.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks