I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Who knows why they signed it, Who knows why the crown made the treaty in the first place.
Maybe the Maoris had heard about Australia and England felt a little guilty.
England never went anywhere and like someone else rule, even in India they ruled the land. so why would they do it here?
If so many didn't even sign it then why is it the first thing they go running to when the want a hand out?
Why was it a false claim to make? they were uncivilized. and they didn't have a flag.
All I do know is, if you keep looking at the past you will stay in the past and too many of Maori leaders want to stay there.
Not who knows... there's an obvious reason if you look through Maori culture and the events around that time. The Treaty reaffirmed their sovereignty, 5 years previous the Declaration of Independence was a Crown declaration of their sovereignty so why would it suddenly be taken away? Pakeha were to be partners because the Maori knew they'd benefit from them. If you read into the debates that took place during the signings of the Treaty (debate, feast and trust being far more important in Maori culture than scribbling on a piece of paper) the outcome to Maori was clear. Chiefs were stating things such as 'What man of sense would believe that the governor will take our land away and give us only a part of it?', 'Hear all of you, Pakeha's and Maoris. This is my speech. My desire is that we should all be of one heart. Speak your words openly; speak as you mean to act; do not say one thing and mean another.', 'You must preserve our customs and never permit our land to be wrested from us.', 'the shadow of the land goes to the Queen but the substance remains with us.'
It was seen as a clear reaffirmation of their power, and they were going to be protected by the Queen in a form of mutual protection. This all was taking place as some settlers were running amok, and both Pakeha and Maori wanted to create a stable relationship. The governor was seen to be bringing an end to inter-tribal violence.
We should obviously look to the future, I think a country based upon Tikanga and mixed with European values would be good. It would make us a far more unique country than the 'Britain of the south' where Maori are treated as circus types only good for attracting tourists.
I never said the English would have not actively tried to rule, but that they did it behind the Maoris back. They didn't actively proclaim they were there to take control, it was a very sneaky trust gaining process followed by a stab in the back.
Claiming the North by cession was wrong since the majority of tribes hadn't signed the Treaty, the United Tribes of New Zealand had a flag from 1835 as set in the Declaration of Independence, but how does a European construct of a flag mean civilized anyway? They claim the south was uncivilized because their concept of civilized was written language, hierarchical governance etc.
And like with India the English should realise their mistakes and depart. Leave the country to its native citizens. It's the only decent thing to do after wiping out such a large part of their culture and diminishing their inherent rights to Aotearoa.
It's sad that you have to ask. They're Treaty of Waitangi partners. That gives them a bunch of rights that they negotiated with the Crown back in 1840. Regrettably the Crown, as represented by subsequent governments in New Zealand, hasn't been that crash hot since then in holding up its end of the bargain negotiated in good faith way back when.
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
Treaty of Waitangi is now defunk.Yes your words hitcher "way back then". Move on. those that it was to serve are now long deceased. Those that now utilize the words of the treaty do so knowing it was not signed for future generations of white/Maori crossbreds, but for Maoris only. Those like yourself with self professed words only serve to encourage those with a white brain to make the most of destroying this country for their own greed and racist to the end they are.
I read that piece and other that the use of language I agree whole heartedly with the woman.
Put simply -YES there should be maori representation in council but that representation needs to be earned in the same way as any other racial group is represented
To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?
Be the person your dog thinks you are...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks