Offence against section 37 of the Land Transport Act 1998.
$3000, court may disqualify, 30 or 35 demerit, and a conviction.
It's what we charge someone with if there isn't a suitable instant fine, aka infringement.
It's what you've done if your driving isn't to the standard of a careful and prudent driver, objectively viewed.
It covers a full range, from someone who hits a car while parallel parking, to someone who crashes a red light and totals several cars.
So, the fine will depend on a variety of things. Time, place and circumstances of the offense. How mean the Popo was when they wrote up the paperwork. What sort of mood the JP is in. What previous convictions exist. Where in the country it happens.
There isn't a real national standard. Fair to say that $600 is quite high, in my experience. Courts never used to disqualify but it's become more common over the years. But so has diversion.
Of course, Azkle knows better than me.
A few years ago I had a head on on a one way bridge (lots of contributing factors but I was at fault) The cop was really good as he could see how it happened, how freaked out I was, bosses car etc & was ready to give us all a lift back into town.
Consequently I got a letter saying I was being charged with careless use of a motor vehicle causing a non injury accident (actually after all 4 of us went to hospital 2 of my workmates were off work for 3 weeks)
Anyway I didn't go to court & sent in a grovelling letter. I got a fine of $300 & 30 demerits.
That is from an accident that fricked up 2 cars & could have been fatal that I caused. I can't see doing a bloody wheelie being too high on their worry list. Don't let it stress you too much... unless you're hanging onto your licence by 10 demerits
In life as in dance Grace glides on blistered feet
offence under the LTA ≠ court case.
there's probably even a section that starts "it is a defence against charges in this section IF:...", within the LTA.
that's one option. and it works. you're welcome to attend any future court dates i have.
but this guy has already admitted guilt and accepted the jurisdiction of teh police/court. so no luck there. he has legitimised it.
It doesn't really matter what you say, but make sure you wink at the judge as obviously and frequently as possible.
Yep, a little unfortunate.
Always deny and disagree. Never apologise, capitulate, or agree with anything at all . Don't touch, handle, or otherwise accept any documentation handed to you, and return-to-sender any that is posted to you, and forbid the person concerned from attaching any paperwork to your vehicle. Explain to the officer that you do not wave your right to a hearing, or any of you other rights. Explain that you reserve your right to a hearing, and all of your other rights.
Explain to the magistrate that did you emphatically did NOT do anything of the sort, and that you won't be coerced into admitting to anything, and when he asks whether you consent to his jurisdiction (he must) look annoyed and tell him "thank you kindly but you do not!"
"I am a licenced motorcycle instructor, I agree with dangerousbastard, no point in repeating what he said."
"read what Steve says. He's right."
"What Steve said pretty much summed it up."
"I did axactly as you said and it worked...!!"
"Wow, Great advise there DB."
WTB: Hyosung bikes or going or not.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks