Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: Wanted: Hornet 900 rear shock

  1. #1
    Join Date
    3rd September 2004 - 08:51
    Bike
    05 iHornet 900
    Location
    Westham
    Posts
    1,751

    Wanted: Hornet 900 rear shock

    Time to give-up on the sad OEM red thing supporting my swing arm.
    Wanting to locate for my 2005 Hornet 919 a Yellow model, Ohlins 46DR

  2. #2
    Join Date
    20th June 2005 - 14:27
    Bike
    Fatbob
    Location
    the 'Tron
    Posts
    1,348

  3. #3
    Join Date
    20th June 2005 - 14:27
    Bike
    Fatbob
    Location
    the 'Tron
    Posts
    1,348
    Unfortunately I google 46dr ohlins (pages only in NZ) and only find me talking about it .. crikey

  4. #4
    Join Date
    5th April 2004 - 20:04
    Bike
    Exxon Valdez
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    13,381
    Get the eye sizes, and buy anything the same. Then get it sprung and valved, and made the right length for the Hornet.

    Can't see any reason someone would sell an ohlins shock for a Hornet unless it's written off. Given how bad the standard one is.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    3rd September 2004 - 08:51
    Bike
    05 iHornet 900
    Location
    Westham
    Posts
    1,751
    The one called the Ohlins Streetline model number HO322 which is still a $(4 digit number)

    Tho Robert Tayor has on his shelf a returned up-spec one,
    (Ohlins HO 201 type 46HRCS with remote reservoir and preload)
    which the price could possibly be negoiated .... tho still end up being a $(4 digit number)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    5th April 2004 - 20:04
    Bike
    Exxon Valdez
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    13,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Warr View Post
    The one called the Ohlins Streetline model number HO322 which is still a $(4 digit number)

    Tho Robert Tayor has on his shelf a returned up-spec one,
    (Ohlins HO 201 type 46HRCS with remote reservoir and preload)
    which the price could possibly be negoiated .... tho still end up being a $(4 digit number)
    You're so limited by Honda's cost saving, non linkage budget rear end. It sucks!

    You are gonna be exceptionally lucky to get one for $(less than four digit number).

    You could probably, chuck a stumpy pipe underneath, and replace the swing arm with something decent with a shock for teh same money. Not Ohlins of course, but probably just as good as a direct action Ohlins can work anyway.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    31st March 2005 - 02:18
    Bike
    CB919, 1090R, R1200GSA
    Location
    East Aucks
    Posts
    10,494
    Blog Entries
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    Can't see any reason someone would sell an ohlins shock for a Hornet unless it's written off. Given how bad the standard one is.
    This is a good point actually... My boss and I both have Ohlins shocks in our Hornets, sprung for our weight etc.

    Wouldn't give them up either. Every few 10's of thou you send it off for a service... (argh, should probably get mine done, it's done 48k)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jane Omorogbe from UK MSN on the KTM990SM
    It's barking mad and if it doesn't turn you into a complete loon within half an hour of cocking a leg over the lofty 875mm seat height, I'll eat my Arai.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    24th July 2006 - 11:53
    Bike
    KTM 1290 SAR
    Location
    Wgtn
    Posts
    5,541
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    You're so limited by Honda's cost saving, non linkage budget rear end. It sucks!
    Now, I'm no expert. But there's very good reasons to avoid the extra complexity and mass of linkages. With direct coupled shocks there's not only fewer moving parts but there's fewer highly loaded and poorly sealed needle rollers to wear out and sieze and generally completely fuck up the relationship between the shock and rear wheel.

    'Course to get the same rising-rate effect from a direct coupled item makes for a higher spec'd, more precisely controled shock valveing system. Like most KTMs. Which possibly partly explains why they're a few Kg lighter than the competition, eh? And certsainly explains why they don't have reliablility issues associated with needle rollers running in mud.
    Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon

  9. #9
    Join Date
    5th April 2004 - 20:04
    Bike
    Exxon Valdez
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    13,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Ocean1 View Post
    Now, I'm no expert. But there's very good reasons to avoid the extra complexity and mass of linkages. With direct coupled shocks there's not only fewer moving parts but there's fewer highly loaded and poorly sealed needle rollers to wear out and sieze and generally completely fuck up the relationship between the shock and rear wheel.

    'Course to get the same rising-rate effect from a direct coupled item makes for a higher spec'd, more precisely controled shock valveing system. Like most KTMs. Which possibly partly explains why they're a few Kg lighter than the competition, eh? And certsainly explains why they don't have reliablility issues associated with needle rollers running in mud.
    All that is probably good on the dirt. Show me a performance bike that runs direct. Not that the Hornet matches that description, but the rear shock is SOOOOOOO bad that an upgrade is nearly a safety requirement.

    On a road bike, the rising rate is more important. As is keeping the shock cooler.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    24th July 2006 - 11:53
    Bike
    KTM 1290 SAR
    Location
    Wgtn
    Posts
    5,541
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    All that is probably good on the dirt. Show me a performance bike that runs direct.
    Does the Buell count?


    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    On a road bike, the rising rate is more important. As is keeping the shock cooler.
    You can get a rising rate with a direct coupled shock too. It's just more harder to organise around engines and wheels and shit getting in the way.
    Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon

  11. #11
    Join Date
    5th April 2004 - 20:04
    Bike
    Exxon Valdez
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    13,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Ocean1 View Post
    Does the Buell count?
    Hahahaha, I deleted a bit where I made a comment about your bike being a farm bike, not a sports bike, but didn't know how you'd take it.




    Quote Originally Posted by Ocean1 View Post
    You can get a rising rate with a direct coupled shock too. It's just more harder to organise around engines and wheels and shit getting in the way.
    yeah, but the shaft still has to move through a longer stroke. So it heats up the oil and stops working quicker.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    14th July 2006 - 21:39
    Bike
    2015, Ducati Streetfighter
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,081
    Blog Entries
    8
    Contact Robert Taylor mate. He set me up with a beauty. Ohlins only made the fancy pants full bells and whistles jobbie specifically for the 900 Hornet.

    Robert will build up the more basioc spec one to Ohlins specs set up for your weight etc.

    Works a friggen treat - a massive improvement on the stock pogo stick.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    5th April 2004 - 20:04
    Bike
    Exxon Valdez
    Location
    wellington
    Posts
    13,381
    Quote Originally Posted by AllanB View Post
    Contact Robert Taylor mate. He set me up with a beauty. Ohlins only made the fancy pants full bells and whistles jobbie specifically for the 900 Hornet.

    Robert will build up the more basioc spec one to Ohlins specs set up for your weight etc.

    Works a friggen treat - a massive improvement on the stock pogo stick.
    Always a good idea to read the whole thread man.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    14th July 2006 - 21:39
    Bike
    2015, Ducati Streetfighter
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,081
    Blog Entries
    8
    Wot?

    Guy wants a Ohlins for a Horny 900. Told him where to geot one. Got one told him how shit hot it is.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    24th July 2006 - 11:53
    Bike
    KTM 1290 SAR
    Location
    Wgtn
    Posts
    5,541
    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    Hahahaha, I deleted a bit where I made a comment about your bike being a farm bike, not a sports bike, but didn't know how you'd take it.
    Well, it lives on a farm, sorta. And I guess you could call it's owner somewhat agricultural...

    But it's a better machine than it's rider knows how to manage. Actually I've rarely had cause to wrinkle the seat from rear suspension performance. The front occasionally worries me.

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew View Post
    yeah, but the shaft still has to move through a longer stroke. So it heats up the oil and stops working quicker.
    The real advantage with a linkage setup is that you can get faster shaft movement as you load it up. That means the spring rate AND the compression valving is ramping up faster as you bottom out. That's very hard to organise with a direct couple.

    I worry about shit like: If shocks were under tension, rather than compression they could be a shitload smaller and lighter.
    Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •