If the road to hell is paved with good intentions; and a man is judged by his deeds and his actions, why say it's the thought that counts? -GrayWolf
Because it's not the same engine. It makes more power.
60hp and 179kg dry makes 168kW/T. Quite clearly over the limit.
Clearly it depends on the source of the 'specs'. And has everyone included the 90 kg allowed for the rider?
I think Koba is 'on the money'
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
Well, yes. But even your Wiki link had 59hp. You don't have to look very far to find reviews and "specs" that show the ER5 and such as significantly slower than the GPZ500.
I've owned a GPZ500 and while I agree that it'd be a reasonable bike to learn on it's certainly got a bit of top end. They're much faster than GS500 (or anyway 4t 250) anyway.
While TPTB might have been happy to include the EX500 based on the original request they received I imagine that this thread has now cast enough doubt on the power output that they won't.
Woops.
www.AdventureRidingNZ.co.nz NZ's dedicated Adventure Riding Community
Forums, free GPS track downloads and much more. Now over 5700 members, are you one of them?
Originally Posted by Billy Connolly
The yamaha FZR400 is on the lams list
Surprised as I worked it out at 178kw per ton
Am now considering buying one haha
Do you enjoy fixing your bike more then riding it?Better off with one of these http://www.trademe.co.nz/motors/moto...-560343108.htm
Get a 3TJ and put an FZR600 lump in it, not hugely hard, and fuck they're a quick wee bugger after it
MSTRS, is this the model ER5 you own http://www.motorcyclespecs.co.za/mod...aki_er5 00.htm
Missread sorry, it's an EX, they were the good one. Sadly they're around the 60hp mark
I also forgot about fluids. Probably adds about 30kg to the dry weight, if radiator, crankcase and fuel tank are all topped off.
For those that think I'm having a fight with tptb...where the hell do you get that idea? I put a question to them, they engaged in dialogue so to speak and I responded with the pertinent info in and on the form they want.
I started this thread to raise awareness of the incomplete list that is LAMS and how to go about putting up bike models for LAMS consideration, but also as a slight tongue in cheek suggestion that the little person has no chance with big brother.
So RM - you might as well crawl back under your rock, you loathsome little reptile.
Last edited by MSTRS; 8th February 2013 at 13:03.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
Check out the Australian market where LAMs approved bikes have been out for quite a few years , NSW RTA website has a list of bikes that are approved here - quite a comprehensive list
If you're not living on the edge you're not leaning over far enough
Looks like it won't happen...
Nothing ventured, nothing gained. But still....fuck it.Thank you for your application to have the Kawasaki EX 500D2 add to the approved LAMS list.
As part of the approval process for the LAMS bike I have verified the power and weight figures with Kawasaki NZ (the original importer of this bike) and they confirm that that this model has 44kw and a dry weight of 176kg, giving us a power to weight ration of 165kw per tonne.
Even if we were to add 13kg for the 18 litres of fuel that would still give us a power to weight ratio of 157kw per tonne.
Based on these figures the Kawasaki EX 500 is not LAMS compliant.
The other bikes you mentioned in your e-mail the EN500, ER500, EX650 and KL650 have all been confirmed by Kawasaki to be compliant, whilst the GPZ550 was carried over from the Australian list and has been verified by Australian authorities.
Do you realise how many holes there could be if people would just take the time to take the dirt out of them?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks