actually, they dont mind it as it pays most there bills,and they brought the track so they could control the revenue (at least the employed lot that run the place no that, maybe some of the members think differently,
10 years ago they said it was safe until it needed the big upgrade and full resurface which would have been millions,
which it just got, thanks somewhat to the auckland tax payer (and you can even see the waikato from the Hairpin now)
Its pretty simple really... Stop racing there. That's a good way to reduce the danger. Not worth the risk of a major injury/death.
On the plus side Puke has claimed it's last victim because MNZ will not sign off on any competition licences for meetings there.
Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
Looking at those concrete barriers I suspect it would be quite expensive to remove and put them back for one race meeting. So although they might be "temporary", the financial implications make them permanent.
From Pukekohe's perspective, they have one group of users for which they have been given a great gob of cash. Then there is this bikers lot over on the side, who only represent 10% of the usage, and aren't fronting up with any cash. So it is easy to see which way they are going.
The only way to have an equal say in a track would be to front with a pile of cash and buy a controlling interest in it. Hampton's is currently requesting more capital, but I doubt any motorcycle club has $10m to $20m, which is the minimum I would guess they would be wanting.
Pukekohe was nice while it lasted, but I think it is going to be relegated to the history books for motorcycle racing. It was nice knowing you.
MNZ's Not "Anti-Puke" ........ I'm certain Billy is no different to me, he simply wont sign off ANY Permit application until he is satisfied that the Circuit is as safe as realistically possible.
Plus there is an internal MNZ process that certifies permanent Circuits, and logically that cant be gone through until the Track changes and all the attendant barrier changes etc etc are finally finished.
That said, while no longer Commissioner, I CAN say MNZ's priority remains SAFETY .............
Can someone enlighten me on the difference between Puke's wall and Hampton's wall? Bothy seem similar in regards to speed and placement coming onto start straights.
Not ridden either so just wondering.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks