You simply offered your opinions against theirs, to actually address their points requires a bit more research.
Perhaps it is obvious some missed the point (of which I explained), but it seems you would rather offer implicit insults than explanations.
I prefer others who already have opinions on the matter to present their cases, then decide how I feel about the issue. Part of the point of referencing is so we all don't have to do the boring research.
Overall, I'd give it a 4/10, 3 cos you made an effort, 3 for offering some substance of debate, but minus 2 for sarcasm and implicit insults.
Bookmarks