ANZACs and war and stuff

[Katman]

WHY? this is KB!!! short for(key board warriors)nobody really gives a shit what you think Mr Troll god

What the fuck does that mean?

All I can see is a classic example of a Kiwibiker who posts simply for the excuse to see his own voice in words.

[Drew]

who posts simply for the excuse to see his own voice in words.

Back the truck UP! I think I've missed another memo.

I only post to marvel my own words later on. I mean really, they're always THERE man.

[Katman]

Man, you're making the fatal error of thinking KB matters.

You think anything on here isn't on a million other websites. Fuck, everything you are trying to convince others with is a link to another site.

Just because he's five oh, doesn't mean he should investigate, or even give a fuck about anything said on here. Shit, I'd be well fucked if he did, since there have been three or four threads about nothing but the wheelies I do.

I think what the dirty copper was saying is, 'who give a fuck what a bunch of KB homos think? It would make no difference to anyone'.

Drew, I'll say this slowly so you can understand.

Any normal idiot I could excuse for not recognising and being intrigued by anomalies in a story.

Any cop though should be interested in getting to the truth of a story.

"Even if" shows a total disinterest in finding out the truth.

[scissorhands]

[Drew]

Drew, I'll say this slowly so you can understand.

Any normal idiot I could excuse for not recognising and being intrigued by anomalies in a story.

Any cop though should be interested in getting to the truth of a story.

"Even if" shows a total disinterest in finding out the truth.

Any cop? Really?

Even one in the middle of butt fuck nowhere, on the other side of the world?

C'mon man, you're over reaching a bit I think.

Why in God's good name would he care? He can do nothing about it. He has no access to actual evidence, just the crap to be found on the net. And most of all, it isn't his job!

[Katman]

Even one in the middle of butt fuck nowhere, on the other side of the world?

Even a cop in the middle of butt fuck nowhere could try convicting you on a charge that you thought was bullshit.

Would you be happy if that cop wasn't interested in finding out the truth?

[98tls]

C'mon man, you're over reaching a bit I think.

Na,surely not.Then again i just remembered Ks location.

[Drew]

Even a cop in the middle of butt fuck nowhere could try convicting you on a charge that you thought was bullshit.

Would you be happy if that cop wasn't interested in finding out the truth?

Keh? He doesn't have to question something, that he is not charged with investigating does he?

Sorry man, you stopped making any sense to me a while ago. I'm off to bed.

[Katman]

Keh? He doesn't have to question something, that he is not charged with investigating does he?

As a cop then yes, I'd expect him to question any anomaly.

Forgive me but I thought cops were supposed to be interested in finding out the truth.

I must be old school.

[98tls]

I must be old school.

Is this Katmans bike posting again?Bikes say the darndest things dont they...

[Hinny]

...there have been three or four threads about nothing but the wheelies I do..

I hope you have been practicing so you can wheelie better than the pathetic attempt I saw posted on KB some time back.
That was embarrassing.

Purely objective observation.

[Ocean1]

I was being facetious.

Well now that you can see that nobody can tell the difference between you being normal and you being silly you can stop it.

The number of facts required to explain any conclusion wrt the cause of the building collapses is very small: A couple of airliners crashed into a couple of buildings. An hour or so later they fell down.

Any other series of explanations rapidly requires many additional unknown suppositions. Like it or not Occam's razor wins this one hands down.

[Hinny]

Well now that you can see that nobody can tell the difference between you being normal and you being silly you can stop it.

The number of facts required to explain any conclusion wrt the cause of the building collapses is very small: A couple of airliners crashed into a couple of buildings. An hour or so later they fell down.

Any other series of explanations rapidly requires many additional unknown suppositions. Like it or not Occam's razor wins this one hands down.

Hardly a cause that is both true and sufficient to explain the occurrence of total collapse.

This simple explanation was, and still is apparently, sufficient for simple people. The American people are notorious for being dumb.
The dissemination of this cause in the immediate aftermath of the collapse raised warning flags to many people. That the information was later determined to have been promoted by actors must surely be cause for further conjecture.

The simple explanation of how they discovered the identity of the hijackers so quickly is in my opinion in the realms of fantasy.
To recap, that explanation was that someone walking past a pile of debris on the 12 of September picked up one of the hijacker's passport. From there the FBI was able to determine that the owner of the passport was worthy of investigation and a raid on their address revealed a list of his accomplices.
That was very fortunate; was it not? ... And unbelievable!
They have a new story out now... 'Mohamed Atta forgot his luggage when he boarded the plane and when his bag was searched they found his passport etc.'
- Fortunate the automatic blowing up of the bag policy was not in force.

What is the simple explanation for the damage to the Pentagon?
A 757 aeroplane is said to have crashed into the side of the building
:at a speed in excess of its rated terminal velocity,
:after being off the radar for 36 minutes,
:leaving one small 5m round hole through seven external walls of a building. Later to be revealed as recently receiving extra reinforcement.
:evading all air defences of the most protected airspace on the planet. - Intercept aircraft and surface to air anti aircraft missiles.
:evading 86 security cameras.
:leaving no trace of the engines. These apparently vapourised - when they hit the windows of the building - without breaking the glass.

Hardly an explanation that should satisfy the man on the Clapham omnibus.

[Kickaha]

What is the simple explanation for the damage to the Pentagon?

The simple explanation was a fuckoff big plane crashed into it as seen by a heap of people

A 757 aeroplane is said to have crashed into the side of the building
:at a speed in excess of its rated terminal velocity,
:after being off the radar for 36 minutes,
:leaving one small 5m round hole through seven external walls of a building. Later to be revealed as recently receiving extra reinforcement.
:evading all air defences of the most protected airspace on the planet. - Intercept aircraft and surface to air anti aircraft missiles.
:evading 86 security cameras.
:leaving no trace of the engines. These apparently vapourised - when they hit the windows of the building - without breaking the glass.

Hardly an explanation that should satisfy the man on the Clapham omnibus.

Oh noes they lost flight 77
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Losing_Flight_77
Photos of engine parts here but hey they were probably planted
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon/
Protected airspace that's used all the time by the airport next door?
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Pe...sile_Batteries
Small 5m hole? sounds like you're digging one for yourself
http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/smallhole.html


Luckily I found the real story though so we can all sleep easy at night knowing what really happened

Flight 77 shot down in mountains of W. Virginia

I just listened to a radio interview with a controller from Boston Center (google video). He states clearly that three of the flights were tracked continuously on 9/11 - on radar - even after two had turned off their transponders. They were NEVER off radar. Flight 77 disappeared from radar over the mountains of W. Virginia. There is only one explanation for this. Flight 77 was SHOT DOWN over the mountains of West Virginia. This was part of the plan. What struck the Pentagon had only been picked up on radar for 60 miles or so as it approached - as evidenced by Norm Mineta's 9/11 Commission testimony, and reinforced by the air traffic controllers interview ("it popped up on radar").

What hit the Pentagon was in fact an A3 Skywarrior from Raytheon's inventory (check their inventory - they're missing one) - painted like an AA jet - powered by a Thiokol solid fuel rocket motor (thus the white smoke in the still frames released by the government), loaded with explosives (thus the smell of cordite evidenced by the hundreds of Pentagon employees present that morning).

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...cy/q0265.shtml

[Kickaha]

Luckily I found the real story though so we can all sleep easy at night knowing what really happened

Changed my mind about that one, maybe it was a Bumble Plane
http://www.public-action.com/911/bumble.html