Forum whore
Enough clearly provable facts have been shown to discredit the conspiracy theories. Now they are clutching at silly straws in a pathetic attempt to justify their dogged ignorance.Originally Posted by Drew
Yup! Long overdue for PD IMHO.Looks like you achieved your aim Drew.
Actually why hasn't this been consigned to PD. It has become just as pointless, if not more so, than the religious arguments.
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
Forum whore
Why did NIST try to cover up the fact that Building 7 fell at freefall speed Ed?
Forum whore
Bollocks! You have been shown enough evidence in this thread to prove how building 7 came down but as usual with you you simply dismiss anything actually proven and cling desperately to your idiotic conspiracy agenda. As I have often said and been proven right, conspiracy theorists will never accept any facts contrary to their theories. You are a copmplete waste of time and space.
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
Forum whore
Bollocks to what Ed?
Bollocks that the building fell at freefall speed or bollocks that NIST tried to cover that fact up?
Forum whore
Read my lips! THERE WERE NO EXPLOSIVES USED IN ANY OF THE BUILDINGS! FACT! PROVEN! BEYOND QUESTION!
THE PLANES THAT HIT THE TOWERS WERE 767'S, AND THE ONE THAT HIT THE PENTAGON WAS A 757 NOT A MISSILE AS SOME SO-CALLED EXPERTS HAVE TESTIFIED! PROVEN! FACT!
As with your silly Boston Bombing thread, IT WAS CAUSED BY TWO BOMBS PLACED BY THE TWO IDENTIFIED CAUSING THREE DEATHS AND MULTIPLE INJURIES! IT WAS NOT A GOVT. SPONSORED ACT!
As I said, enough facts are proven to show your conspiracies to be utter bunkum!
But of course you will never admith to being wrong about these two events, or pretty much anything else you have a bee in your bonnet about, will you?
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
Aio ki te Aorangi
If the plane had been fueled with thermite, would there have been enough to do the damage?
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Forum whore
Why won't you answer the question Ed?Read my lips! THERE WERE NO EXPLOSIVES USED IN ANY OF THE BUILDINGS! FACT! PROVEN! BEYOND QUESTION!
THE PLANES THAT HIT THE TOWERS WERE 767'S, AND THE ONE THAT HIT THE PENTAGON WAS A 757 NOT A MISSILE AS SOME SO-CALLED EXPERTS HAVE TESTIFIED! PROVEN! FACT!
As with your silly Boston Bombing thread, IT WAS CAUSED BY TWO BOMBS PLACED BY THE TWO IDENTIFIED CAUSING THREE DEATHS AND MULTIPLE INJURIES! IT WAS NOT A GOVT. SPONSORED ACT!
As I said, enough facts are proven to show your conspiracies to be utter bunkum!
But of course you will never admith to being wrong about these two events, or pretty much anything else you have a bee in your bonnet about, will you?
Anarchic Wild Child
Huh ?? What ??? My understanding of the laws of Gravity is that everything falls at freefall speed ... that's the definitinon of freefall speed ..
The only exceptions are where it is affected by the air - such as a feather falling ...
But a building is too heavy for that - of course it's going to fal at freefall speed ...
(Oh shit .. I wasn't going to get sucked into this debate again ...)
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
Forum whore
Freefall speed only occurs when there is no resistance to the downward motion.
For example, a building that pancakes down upon itself one floor at a time will most certainly not fall at freefall speed.
So why did NIST initially try to claim that Building 7 fell at about 40% slower than freefall speed?
Anarchic Wild Child
So hang on .. what you are suggesting is that a building will never fall at freefall speeds ... but you are saying that Building 7 did fall at freefall speeds ..
What you are suggesting is an impossibility - whether it was casued by deliberately planted exploasives or damaged caused by the neighboring building falling ... it's an impossibility ...
There's something screwy in your reasoning here ... (and all over the place .. but let's just deal with here right now ...)
"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
Forum whore
What part of, "There were no explosives" don't you understand?
You see why I call him a waste of time and space. I'm beyond caring what he thinks.
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
Forum whore
I'm not saying that at all.
If you simultaneously remove/sever every supporting column across the floor area and over several levels, then that building is most certainly going to fall at almost exactly freefall speed.
That's precisely what demolition experts try to achieve.
Forum whore
Why won't you answer the question Ed?
Forum whore
Is the question too hard?
Forum whore
The question is stupid of course. If no explosives were used it matters not how fast the building fell. Anyone can watch the building fall on several available vidoes and see for themselves how fast it fell down.
You should know by now, (among a host of other things...), that even eyewitnesses often disagree on events and reports change as more information comes to light. There is no evidence of any deliberate cover ups by any agencies. Only questions from conspiracy theorists who blithely ignore the actual facts as you do.
Nuff said!
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks