Yeah they're for choppers and Harleys, but they illustrate what's going on.
On a race bike often the back end will be jacked up way above the standard setting, thereby reducing the trail on the front wheel. So adjusting the rake to slightly steeper than the steering head angle gives you more trail, offsetting that lost from jacking the arse up.
Fully adjustable triple clamps are something I've lusted over since I started racing.
Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
That's different. Adjusting the top and bottom of the stem means the forks are still parallel. Whereas different offsets on the triple clamps the forks are at a different angle to the steering head.
Changing the steering head angle changes the wheel base of the bike. Changing the offset of the triples allows you to keep the same wheel base if done correctly.
Zen wisdom: No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously. - obviously had KB in mind when he came up with that gem
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
It's more to do with suspension action I think. Cos with a raked tree, it's still pivoting around the headstock angle, same as with a parralel tree with modified offest. But then as the suspension moves, it's not parrallel to the steering angle, so the effective fork offset changes based on suspension position.
I think. I'm not a racer.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
Buell changed the XB12X for the last model. They'd always had piss poor steering lock, so they made new clamps with the forks an inch further forward, to get more clearance from that big fuckoff headstock. They also moved the axle back 1" in the fork endcap. Same rake, same trail, more steering angle.
Split spherical clamp inserts have been around for engineering applications for ages, they'd work just fine with an eccentric sleeve in the fork clamps to change fork angle.
Edit: I'm not convinced that the offset and head angle required to get the correct trail just happens to be the optimum angle for the forks to work at. It's certainly easier to manufacture bikes that way but I wonder how close the resulting fork angle is to the angle that results in the least side, (fwd/aft) load, IE: pointing directly at the compression forces.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks