Mark Lundy - miscarriage of justice?

[korimako1]

[QUOTE=Trade_nancy;1130577013]

nigel latta, some else trying to prove himself on Tv with asumptions and guesswork. has he ever spoken to Lundy, i dont think so,


Isn't this comment of YOURS an assumption? I believe he actually did interview/speak to Lundy.

No he has never spoken to or interviewed Mark. he only spoke to people who wanted their 15 seconds of fame and were prepared to tell him negative things about Mark, anyone who spoke in favour of Mark only made it to the cutting room floor.

[korimako1]

You didn't read my whole post did you?

I said I wasn't there, and even gave a possible motivation for hamming it up.

You say a lot for someone with a zero post count....

Sorry I didnt realise that I have to have a number of posts before I can reply to other peoples posts. there is so much misinformation out there, just trying to help.

[Drew]

Sorry I didnt realise that I have to have a number of posts before I can reply to other peoples posts. there is so much misinformation out there, just trying to help.

The last line of my post, was more about my confusion that your post count doesn't climb from zero.

[MisterD]

The last line of my post, was more about my confusion that your post count doesn't climb from zero.

Posts in R&R don't count towards your tally

[Katman]

For anyone that hasn't read the North & South article.....

http://www.lundytruth.com/files/NS-lundy.pdf

[Crasherfromwayback]

For anyone that hasn't read the North & South article.....

http://www.lundytruth.com/files/NS-lundy.pdf

It's a good read. I guess the time of death due to the food's state means Lundy could've done it well later though?

[Katman]

It's a good read. I guess the time of death due to the food's state means Lundy could've done it well later though?

Except for the cellphone data placing him back in Wellington at 8.30

There was also evidence given that there was a light on in the Lundy's house at 11 that night.

[Crasherfromwayback]

Except for the cellphone data placing him back in Wellington at 8.30

There was also evidence given that there was a light on in the Lundy's house at 11 that night.

Yeah Iwas wondering if maybe he could've done it after banging the hooker. Perhaps Christine was still up at 11 hence the light being on...

[Katman]

Yeah Iwas wondering if maybe he could've done it after banging the hooker. Perhaps Christine was still up at 11 hence the light being on...

That would certainly make the eye witness's evidence worthless.

[Crasherfromwayback]

That would certainly make the eye witness's evidence worthless.

Sounded like BS to me anyway.

[Katman]

Sounded like BS to me anyway.

Absolutely.

How the prosecution presented that evidence with a straight face is beyond me.

[Drew]

Absolutely.

How the prosecution presented that evidence with a straight face is beyond me.

How the blind old clairvoyant presented her evidence with a straight face, is beyond me.

There must have been some investigation into the possibility that he nailed the hooker, then went home to kill them. Mind you, if the cops took the evidence of the pathologist as gospel, maybe not.

[Maha]

It's my opinion that on the ‘did he/didn’t’ debate, the Police got the right people (but one) for NZ's six most well-known murder mysteries.

David Bain/Scott Watson/Mark Lundy/David Tamahere and Ewen MacDonald.

They only got it wrong with Arthur Thomas, where corruption and pressure to find a killer overrode factual evidence.
Right up until several days before arresting Thomas, Hutton and his team had the killer inside the house. That scenario did not suit a Thomas conviction, hence the concocted ‘outside through the louvre windows’ scenario.

[White trash]

For anyone that hasn't read the North & South article.....

http://www.lundytruth.com/files/NS-lundy.pdf

Fuck that's a long article. Casts pretty serious doubts though.

[Maha]

Fuck that's a long article. Casts pretty serious doubts though.

A juror will come to a decision after hearing (and based on) what's presented on Court by both sides, all very well to reassess after the fact.....innit?