Aye, no doubt.
And as I've said before almost all of the difference in historic house costs is down to the size of the houses. In 1950 a family home was almost universally 100 sqM, now it's well over 200. The rest is explainable by the costs of technology and features that simply weren't available then and would have been considered unaffordable luxuries two generations ago.
Quick google for those who bleat about unsupported opinion....
Here y'go, only goes from 1976 at 121sqM to 2011 at 219, but you get the idea, double the size and what would you expect to happen to the price?: http://www.creative.auckland.ac.nz/w...HRC%202010.pdf
Bookmarks