I'm OK with electronics coz I just like seeing bikes go fast and some of the dicing even in MotoGP was pretty good.
I'm old enough to have seen Geoff Perry race and no electronics in sight he would win races by a country mile. Then through the decades in NZ there were other notable riders like Dave Hiscock and then Robert Holden. Those guys quite often got a break and cleared off into the distance.
Same in 500GP, think of Hailwood, Agostini, Roberts, Spencer, Doohan. The cream always rises to the top and, no matter what, those guys could easily annihilate the opposition on a good day. The racing wasn't always close and it has little to do with electronics. The best riders would win and it is the same now. MM is scraping his elbows for chrissake and that is putting on a show.
The big thing is flow on into design for safer or better street bikes too. That has to be good.
Surely the real issue around cost of MotoGP is to do with just how professional it has got - the riders pay, the cost of motorhomes and hospitality, the skimming off the top by the owners of the rights (Dorna), the cost of track hire, TV and video rights etc, everyone wants their cut now. Look at fricken Ecclestone in F1 he's a billionaire off the back of guys taking a risk at their "sport". This is no different than rugby is now and many sports.
We live in the world of entertainment and not so many people are needed for labouring jobs and sport has become a job and like many service industries is filling a gap in the labour pool and a place for us to spend money.
That's progress folks and I think its pointless trying to fight it but it depends at what level - at prototype level I think you need the development so I'm happy with it in MotoGP. In lesser classes yeah sure go for lower levels of development. Doesn't matter the human race will race anything as long as they are in fair classes e.g. Vespa against Vespa not Vespa against RC213V else it would be like Conner's catamaran vs NZ1.



Reply With Quote



Bookmarks