Russell Brand vs. Jeremy Paxman

**mashman** · 25th October 2013, 11:52

FUCK YEAH!

**scott411** · 25th October 2013, 12:27

Russell Brand is an awesome interview, and extremely intelligent, he takes down guys like this easily,

again tho, he says the system is broken, but does not really suggest an alternative, and if he really got a good plan, he has the money, star power and intelligence to pull it off, and get some decent numbers of support,

**bluninja** · 25th October 2013, 12:52

What a tosser.....any idiot can say what's obvious and what they are against. Creating and delivering a new vision is the challenge. Of course Russell could ease some of the disparity by doing his shows for free, for donating all his income above a certain level to impoverished people.

Why tax the rich heavily? Why not change it so that people spread their wealth as the best way to live?

**Hitcher** · 25th October 2013, 13:00

Too many big words. Way too many.

**MisterD** · 25th October 2013, 13:11

He's either a really clever satire or dumb as a sack of hammers...my money's on the second option.

**Smifffy** · 25th October 2013, 14:07

Originally Posted by MisterD

He's either a really clever satire or dumb as a sack of hammers...my money's on the second option.

I reckon he's a really clever sack of hammers.

**tigertim20** · 25th October 2013, 15:46

Originally Posted by Smifffy

I reckon he's a really clever sack of hammers.

it's easy to look clever when you are finding the most complicated way of explaining a basic idea or principle.

Did't albert einstein say something like, 'If you cant\'t explain it in simple terms, you dont understand it properly yourself' -or something to that effect?

need more proof he's a dumb cunt?
He could still be fucking this tasty piece, but he let is pass him by:

yes its a shit song, but she's fuckin hot

**mashman** · 25th October 2013, 22:03

Originally Posted by scott411

Russell Brand is an awesome interview, and extremely intelligent, he takes down guys like this easily,

again tho, he says the system is broken, but does not really suggest an alternative, and if he really got a good plan, he has the money, star power and intelligence to pull it off, and get some decent numbers of support,

He's welcome at my place whenever he has time

Originally Posted by Hitcher

Too many big words. Way too many.

Prolly the only reason they have him on.

**Woodman** · 25th October 2013, 22:19

He has a lot of good points. Don't disagree with him at all

**Laava** · 28th October 2013, 22:10

He does have a lot of good ideas, not all of them practical and I thought Jeremy Paxman did a good job of the interview. Russell Brand is a very hard person to interview because he is very intelligent and also arrogant so does not put up with anything he doesn,t like. He obviously has respect for Paxman
So if there was a candidate that stood for everything he agrees with, would he vote for them? Or not, on principle?

**Tazz** · 29th October 2013, 20:47

Pretty sure I've got a DVD with Bill Hicks saying similar stuff, only 20 years ago

**BoristheBiter** · 29th October 2013, 21:07

Originally Posted by mashman

He's welcome at my place whenever he has time

Prolly the only reason they have him on.

Yep bet you would have lots to say as neither would listen.

But like you he doesn't vote so has no chance to change the system he says is broke.

all big talk, and it is all regurgitated cliches from the left, that's all it is as like most, if not all, celebrities he is full of his own self importance and little else.

If he felt so strongly about it he would do all his work for free and give his money away to help the cause but he loves the evil money and all the perks it brings.

**mashman** · 29th October 2013, 21:52

Originally Posted by BoristheBiter

If he felt so strongly about it he would do all his work for free and give his money away to help the cause but he loves the evil money and all the perks it brings.

No he wouldn't. It's gonna take money to change the world, even if you eventually wanna get rid of the stuff.