Drug testing?

**nodrog:Me** · 2nd December 2013, 18:43

Originally Posted by Katman

So let's recap......

I find it incredible that no effort seems to be going into testing for legal highs.....

is this classed as an effort?

Originally Posted by MNZ

The Sports Anti-Doping rules made by Drug Free Sport New Zealand (DFS) under the provisions of the Sports Anti-Doping Act 2006, will become Motorcycling New Zealand's Anti-Doping Rules

http://www.drugfreesport.org.nz/site...ng%20Rules.pdf
http://www.drugfreesport.org.nz/site...st-2014-EN.pdf

**Katman** · 2nd December 2013, 18:54

Originally Posted by nodrog

is this classed as an effort?

I don't know - do they make any mention of the legal highs that we currently have on the market?

**Biggles08** · 2nd December 2013, 19:12

Originally Posted by Katman

So let's recap......

"blaa blaa....I think it's morally inept to condemn someone for showing a trace of THC in their system... blaaa blaa

Who's taking the moral high ground now Katman? Anyway, I'm over this already. If you cared you would see no one disagrees with you about how bad it is legal highs are and racing...this DOES NOT EXCLUDE HOW BAD OTHER DRUGS/MIND ALTERING SUBSTANCES LIKE WEED ARE HOWEVER...got it???

Like I said, this is entertainment for you and that is all.

**Katman** · 2nd December 2013, 19:21

Originally Posted by Biggles08

this DOES NOT EXCLUDE HOW BAD OTHER DRUGS/MIND ALTERING SUBSTANCES LIKE WEED ARE HOWEVER...got it???

Are you still talking in the context of racing?

If those mind altering substances are impairing ones judgement at the time of racing then I'm not disagreeing with you at all.

If, on the other hand, you are saying other drugs/mind altering substances like weed are bad regardless of what one may or may not be participating in, then it is quite clearly you who is taking the moral high ground.

**nodrog:Me** · 2nd December 2013, 19:50

Originally Posted by Katman

I don't know - do they make any mention of the legal highs that we currently have on the market?

yes

__________________

**Katman** · 2nd December 2013, 19:51

Originally Posted by nodrog

yes

__________________

Take my hand and lead me there.

**nodrog:Me** · 2nd December 2013, 19:56

Originally Posted by Katman

Take my hand and lead me there.

Where has it been first?

theres a list of naughty ingredients in one of those links.

**Katman** · 2nd December 2013, 20:11

Originally Posted by nodrog

theres a list of naughty ingredients in one of those links.

Ok, so I finally managed to find synthetic cannabinoids on the prohibited list - without holding your hand.

Do the current testing methods have the ability to identify all of the current legal highs?

**jellywrestler** · 2nd December 2013, 20:44

Originally Posted by jasonu

No, the easy option is if you intend to partake in motorcycle racing, don't partake in doobie smoking.

what if you just dont inhale?

**scrivy** · 3rd December 2013, 08:47

Originally Posted by jellywrestler

what if you just dont inhale?

That's abit like saying the cheques in your mouth and I won't come in your mailbox.....

errr... you know what I mean.....

**jasonu** · 3rd December 2013, 12:46

Originally Posted by jellywrestler

what if you just dont inhale?

As long as you don't swallow it should be OK...

**Katman** · 3rd December 2013, 19:41

Originally Posted by jasonu

As long as you don't swallow it should be OK...

So what happened when you swallowed?

**kiwi cowboy** · 3rd December 2013, 20:40

Originally Posted by haydes55

If a test shows traces of THC, what concern should it be of how much is present?

Zero is the number below 1. It is also the limit of any drug whilst other peoples lives are in your hands. ZERO. Can you count to zero? (Ironically I think it's technically impossible to count to zero).

10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0

so what do I win.