Having just read the MNZ Constitution, (3.5) and The Code of Conduct, (xi) it strikes me that the opportunity was there for action to be taken against the actual bike builders in many of these cases, rather than the kid's riding them. A sticking point though would be if the builder was neither a member of an MNZ affiliated club or an MNZ race licence holder, is he then immune to any action. It would theoretically be possible for someone untouchable by MNZ to operate in any way they chose, assuming they didn't care what action was taken against the rider.
This is making the grand assumption of course,,,that MNZ was actually capable to carry out and follow through on any disciplinary action that could survive the Appeal Committee. Nobody will care about being bitten by a dog with a loud bark and no teeth. At worst,, you get a nasty suck on the ankle, at best you get to operate as you wish, take Championships, and gloat at all who will listen at how bloody clever you were. Some are still patting themselves on the back for cheating in the 70's and 80's. It's all been done before,,,and some admire them for getting away with it..
"That's rooted!! What's next??"
Bookmarks