So the guy who's bought the political left in NZ is a Nazi sympathiser

**Brian d marge** · 29th March 2014, 12:04

Originally Posted by Oscar

So you believe the Old Idiots ravings?
Essentially that WW2 was started by the banks?

You're even stupider than your usual complete inability to communicate through the medium of the written word would indicate.

You understand

Did I say any thing about the banks?

I prefer the raving of a senior person to the hate filled, materially spare one liners you usually trot out

Stephen

**Oscar** · 29th March 2014, 13:05

Originally Posted by Brian d marge

You understand

Did I say any thing about the banks?

I prefer the raving of a senior person to the hate filled, materially spare one liners you usually trot out

Stephen

Your grammar, punctuation and general use of the language make it hard to fathom what you're on about most of the time.
This instance is no exception.

**Oscar** · 29th March 2014, 13:06

Originally Posted by oneofsix

Not directly the banks but the greedy repatriations they drove from WWI is well documented as the cause of the civil unrest that lead to the Nazi parties grabbing power, this is why they decided to help rebuild rather than punish post WWII.

I agree, but that was driven on Govt level, particularly by the French.

**mashman** · 29th March 2014, 13:16

Originally Posted by Oscar

Your grammar, punctuation and general use of the language make it hard to fathom what you're on about most of the time.
This instance is no exception.

I understood him.

**oldrider** · 29th March 2014, 14:13

Originally Posted by Oscar

I agree, but that was driven on Govt level, particularly by the French.

Oscar, Hitler wrote his intentions (Mien Campf) and published it 18 July 1925!

Doesn't it seem odd to you that he was financed into power at all? ... Google "Who financed Hitler into power?" and take your pick!

There are pages and pages on the subject and then ask the question "Who benefits"?

After years and years of reading certain pictures begin to emerge!

When I started there were only libraries etc no internet, it was slow and time consuming and most of the information was unbelievable!

It can be a compelling subject and difficult to substantiate truth from fiction but like any interesting subject, hard to put aside.

For your information , I am not anti semitic but I believe that certain Jewish "leaders" historically have a lot to answer for and all is not as it seems!

**Oscar** · 29th March 2014, 15:09

Originally Posted by mashman

I understood him.

That figures.

**Oscar** · 29th March 2014, 15:11

Originally Posted by oldrider

Oscar, Hitler wrote his intentions (Mien Campf) and published it 18 July 1925!

Doesn't it seem odd to you that he was financed into power at all? ... Google "Who financed Hitler into power?" and take your pick!

There are pages and pages on the subject and then ask the question "Who benefits"?

After years and years of reading certain pictures begin to emerge!

When I started there were only libraries etc no internet, it was slow and time consuming and most of the information was unbelievable!

It can be a compelling subject and difficult to substantiate truth from fiction but like any interesting subject, hard to put aside.

For your information , I am not anti semitic but I believe that certain Jewish "leaders" historically have a lot to answer for and all is not as it seems!

Aren't you a bit old to believe everything that you read on the internet?
As for Hitler being financed into power, why do you find that so interesting?
If his financiers were so smart, why did they allow him to wreck Germany?

**Swoop** · 29th March 2014, 16:53

Originally Posted by 98tls

The Swiss are still not to keen to release funds... , neutrality at its best.

The Swiss neutral?

**oldrider** · 29th March 2014, 17:45

Originally Posted by Oscar

As for Hitler being financed into power, why do you find that so interesting?
If his financiers were so smart, why did they allow him to wreck Germany?

A) Because they especially wanted him to make limited progress in his projected intention or he wouldn't have got the money.

B) He didn't intend to wreck Germany he was more successful than his backers anticipated and Germany was wrecked in order to contain him!

C) The same financiers were backing both sides and pulled the puppet strings as required.

**T.W.R** · 29th March 2014, 18:01

Oscar should read a bit more

The ass reaming Germany got via Treaty of Versailles was a major influence in Hitlers coming to power.

If the roles were reversed and he'd been part of the British Empire or USA he'd have been lorded as a Patriot.
Mind though he didn't help himself being delusional

**Oscar** · 29th March 2014, 18:09

Originally Posted by T.W.R

Oscar should read a bit more

The ass reaming Germany got via Treaty of Versailles was a major influence in Hitlers coming to power.

If the roles were reversed and he'd been part of the British Empire or USA he'd have been lorded as a Patriot.
Mind though he didn't help himself being delusional

And you should read the whole thread before posting.
I quite familiar with that part of history.
The old idiot's theory was the banks caused the war.

**Oscar** · 29th March 2014, 18:12

Originally Posted by oldrider

A)
The same financiers were backing both sides and pulled the puppet strings as required.

And here it is - the conspiracy theory.
You have proof of this, of course.

Not just that the same banks existed in Europe and the US, but they actively took a part in starting the war?
I suppose the same banks were active in Japan?

**Akzle** · 29th March 2014, 18:20

im going to vote for hitler.

**carbonhed** · 29th March 2014, 18:59

Krim.con decides to pay some of the many hard working Kiwi's he's been holding out on for the last couple of years. That's big of him. Well actually that's fucking enormous of him. Amazing what a bit of bad publicity can do when you're busy launching your own political party... The Society for the Prevention of Kim Dotcom’s Extradition.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=11228390