I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Note I stated "you pay you play". Amount was never a consideration. The few I have met in NZ who don't pay.......don't want to play and want to be left alone.
Note also I stated "vested interest" not "invested interest", the 2 are fundamentally different in terms of non-tangible buy-in.
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
You do know the term Democratically is the same as stating trees are living things.
Some of us are not saying dump democracy. Just to fix it. Allow people to vote and elect more than just representatives.
Currently in NZ - referendums are non-binding. I ask - what is the point of having something that no-one has to check/use/compare?
Why waste time and effort?
Dictatorships seem a far more efficient means, if we simple elect representatives - why not just elect a dictator to tell us what to do? Save us all this hassle of referendums that no-one uses to make decisions. It would also save us having to be lied to.
Or we could make small changes in NZ (such as make all referendums binding) where every now and then, when the people speak - the government is forced to listen. Thus making us a stronger democracy. Rather than just a democratically elected, dictatorship ruled one.
Do you believe that a majority of NZ is too stupid to control their own lives? If so are you above or below average intelligence in NZ?
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
Voting only changes the players. It doesnt change the game.
Comment from Warren Buffet article in another thread suitable for repeating here!![]()
Politicians.......Don't you just love them..![]()
But the amount is definitely a required consideration for sustainability. We currently have 55% of taxpayers drawing more in benefits than they're contributing in tax.
That's fucking absurd. And it's what's driving the other effect you bitch about: arbitrary public service budget constraints. Like ACC's blanket denials for cover, based on nothing more than generic reasons designed to manage the budget.
I've had a senior polly tell me that's scope creep. Which is bullshit, I manage projects, I know what scope creep is. The problem's got the same solution, though: Define and cost the objectives adequately in the first place. As you say: require detailed budget plans for every cost centre for eligibility to govern, and then hold them to it. Stop the arseholes promising everything to everyone and then immediately breaking those promises.
The other thing that has to change, there: Middle income NZers have to live within their means. So firstly change the tax system so that govt doesn't take so much from them that they have to give some of it back in order to pay critical bills. And then restructure benefits so that just those that can't survive without them in fact receive them.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Insomuch as there's lots of different flavours, yes. My point was that any of them are better than any of the alternatives.
Agree with most of the rest.
I believe that a majority of NZ think they're entitled to more than they earn, see the above post.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Maybe an electronic thingy like the X factor would do it ... whenever more than the "minority" push their button the big X lights up and a very loud buzzer goes off!![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks