Who do you think is paying for this?
I saw the dickwad on TV last night - his definition of being an accessory to a crime would include the helicopter pilot who flew Banks to the Dotcom Lunch.
What a waste of fucking time and money.
Still, it'll keep you tinfoil cap types happy for a while.
Well thats about all it takes for piracy, so why not extend that to other laws too
I haven't paid attention to this, cause I really don't care; but I thought part of this case was the audio recording of Key telling the cops what to do... You know obeying the whole "separation of police & state" & all that.
I don't expect this to cost much at all, I'm expecting Key/Govt to illegally interfere & have this squashed before it gets anywhere; Like they allegedly tried with the Banks thing
Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance"Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
""
and this is all it takes for national voting types to justify to themselves a complete lack of critical analysis, or any thinking at all, really.
Dismiss things that dont conform, and somehow, with no basis in fact, take a morally superior position.
1)these fuckwits are allowed to vote (and breed)
2)you share the road with them.
The fact that I can read and think does not make me morally superior, it just makes me smarter than you (not an difficult feat, to be fair).
It's a pity your five years in Standard Four did not result in much in the way of reading comprehension. You will note that I said earlier that I watched the idiot accountant being interviewed on TV last night and said that his grasp of the legal definition of an accessory was somewhat lacking. This is a critical analysis and is better than you constant ad hominem class warfare nonsense.
I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks