The observer of course.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
Yeh but the idea behind relativity, is the observer has to be able to be anywhere, without noticing effects of velocity. Put it this way, you have an observer next to the speck of dust, and reckon since the dust has no vel it just gets pushed aside? but if said observer is sitting in the spaceship, said dust is oncoming at lightspeed and will wreck shit. Shit don't work like that.
"A shark on whiskey is mighty risky, but a shark on beer is a beer engineer" - Tad Ghostal
I think we're getting into trouble applying Newtonian principles to relativistic speeds. I'll have to ask my wife. She's the physicist.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks