
Originally Posted by
Madness
One doesn't simply read too much into one of your statements.
Well, you clearly missed the significance of the word "may". Perhaps you need grammar lessons.

Originally Posted by
Madness
Might I suggest that any kind of speed enforcement will probably just catch those operating a vehicle at a speed higher than that of the posted limit and whether the operator of this vehicle is in your opinion safe, safer or perhaps unsafe is completely irrelevant.
I see you agree, then, that speed enforcement has nothing to do with safety.

Originally Posted by
Madness
To argue otherwise is the realm of sandal-wearing hippies and dickheads that haven't learned how to play the game yet.
This statement clearly identifies you as a right-fighter. The actual truth (be that your side, my side or somewhere in the middle) holds no interest for you I assume?
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
Bookmarks