I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
What a load of crap. You can't blame that on GW without wome serious investigation into the chemical make up of the tarmac. I would hazard a guess that the culprit is more likely a crap surface that has a melting point that's far too low. Hell, NZ's roads melt at if the ambient temperature in anything nearing the mid to high 20s.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
I take it you didn't read very far.....
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
As long as there is consumerism anyhoo.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/asia/67...hinas-internet
Manopausal.
Make that "(by approx .01 of a degree)" and you would be closer to the claimed result. However, not all are dirty low life shills, a few are, a very few that is. Most climate scientists are involved in genuine research, and are not into the politics of the IPCC and the AGW claims.
If you read the research literature rather than the MSM you would get a totally different idea of what is happening to the climate. I.e. It is currently in a pause, or even cooling.
Time to ride
I do (a bit) and I know we're not warming As the IPC and UN would have us believe (through their promotion of falsely presented evidence). They have a big voice that 90+% of people believe to be gospel. What chance does the truth have when "Most climate scientists who are involved in genuine research, and who are not into the politics of the IPCC and the AGW claims" remain silent in the face of those lies which are said to represent their "science"? Whether the lie is based on a .1% or 0.1% lie, it's still a lie. The real unfalsifiable evidence does not support their lies, but the 0.1% lie does.
Until those "scientists" take control of the voice of their "science' and right this wrong, their "science" is nothing more than a fraud based on lies. That is the truth.
Political correctness: a doctrine which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd from the clean end.
Highest temps recorded by me on a BMS ( Building Management System ) in East Tamaki this summer were in March, 26 degrees.
I noticed riding back into Auckland last Sunday how hot it was, suspect roads being black and absorbing heat is contributing to Global Warming, roads really need to be white to reflect the sun.![]()
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
The global average temperature is currently just under 14C. Each doubling of CO2 causes an increase of around 1.2C (on latest IPCC data) so to get to 38C would require the CO2 concentration to be doubled 20 times. Yes 2^20. As the present concentration is 400 ppm (0.0004) then to get to 2^20 times the present concentration would require 1048576 x 0.0004 ppm. You can check this yourself but that is 419 times more CO2 in the atmosphere than there is currently atmosphere in total. As O2 is only 21% of the atmosphere, where is the oxygen required to make this amount of CO2 going to come from?
Time to ride
Yes, the jet stream has shifted. It is no longer where it was in 1990, or even in 1980, but it is exactly where it was in 1955. Remember that the idea of a jet stream came about during trans Atlantic flights in WW2. It was first described as a theory in 1947 by Namias, and expanded on in 1949 by Namais and Clapp. It wasn't confirmed until 1955, when it was actually measured and its wave nature mapped. It was then in the same locations as it is now, but had moved somewhat in between times. We do not yet have sufficient data to predict its behaviour over time, although it does show remarkable teleconnection with the main oceanic indices.
Yes it is. Particularly in the cities. But in most rural areas today's temperatures are very similar to 60 years ago. NIWA's 7 and 11 station series both show that most of New Zealand's warming happened prior to 1955. Anthropogenic Global Warming theory says that most warming should have been since 1955.
Time to ride
Rajendra Pachauri head of the UN IPCC has had to resign because he's a serial sex pest. With junior members of staff... as per.
In his resignation letter he says :- "For me, the protection of Planet Earth, the survival of all species and sustainability of our ecosystems is more than a mission. It is my religion and my dharma.”
So there's your dispassionate, objective, rational assesment of scientific evidence flushed by an ecotard douchebag.
Good to know the trillions the West is spending is in such good hands.
http://quadrant.org.au/opinion/doome...oped-97-women/
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin (1706-90)
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending to much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826)
"Motorcycling is not inherently dangerous. It is, however, EXTREMELY unforgiving of inattention, ignorance, incompetence and stupidity!" - Anonymous
"Live to Ride, Ride to Live"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks