I didn't think!!! I experimented!!!
Many years ago I was a crosscutter in a logging gang clearing old native forest for pine planting down Pureora way. Last big native I felled was a beautiful tall Matai. I can still remember the creaking of the trunk breaking away from the holding wood and the crash as the tree hit the ground and the silence afterwards.
Dropping the tree was part of the clearing operation but that didn't help me feel any better. Possibly 5 or 6 hundred years of living destroyed in 30 minutes. Stump was about 1.5 metres across, mostly solid heartwood.
" Rule books are for the Guidance of the Wise, and the Obedience of Fools"
I do have issues with bloody dogooders who take it upon themselves to decide what should stay and what should go on other peoples property. Has a tree expert of any kind been consulted to establish if this particular specimen should be preserved, or is it just emotive crap?
Brings to mind the idiots who wanted to save the old buildings in Christchurch that didn't belong to them, but bore no responsibility when they fell down and killed people in the next earthquake, idealism is nice but not always appropriate
Riding cheap crappy old bikes badly since 1987
Tagorama maps: Transalpers map first 100 tags..................Map of tags 101-200......................Latest map, tag # 201-->
it's not a bad thing till you throw a KLR into the mix.
those cheap ass bitches can do anything with ductape.
(PostalDave on ADVrider)
an 'arborist' (quite possibly on teh payroll) did provide a report (all this information is out there if you care to look)
however, upon review by someone who know's more about trees and less about chainsaws, and has a stack of acronyms after their name, found that the 'report' was 98% bollox.
(the arborist report included things like "kauri's can't grow on their own and need others roots to hold them up, so this one is going to fall on a preschool and kill all the kiddies")
fucktually incorrect.
you can buy "titles"
BUT the jurisdiction of the crown encompasses ONLY water, not land. (admiralty law eh)
rbjiafp.
There is a 'cosy' relationship between developers the council, my mate found that out when they knocked an old villa down next to him and built 4 houses despite boundary issues and they just chopped down all the native trees.
The Council and Developers threatened him with legal action if he kicked up a fuss.
The kauri was there when they bought it and everyone knows you can't just chop them down, they manipulated the system.
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
Aucklanders have got the Mayor and council that they deserve - only problem is (for the rest of NZ) that Auckland represents NZ in the real world!![]()
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks