When is capital punishment ever justifiable?

[Madness]

Who gets to decide the 'safe' exposure limits?

Ed.

http://www.nugshots.com/category/photo-gallery/

[Big Dog]

a 'safe' dose of meth is subjective. As a 'safe' dose of tramadol. (hi(gh) ed!), or a safe dose of heroin/morphine, or coffee, or sugar (srsly, how many suffer sugar sickness/diabetes nowtimes?) or flourine, or ppm of diesel particulates, or voc, or, or, or.

Who gets to decide the 'safe' exposure limits?

Kind of my point. Make the slingers responsible for experimenting until they know what a safe dose is. If they aren't prepared to take what they are selling they shouldn't sell it.


Stupid phone / Tapatalk, apologies in advance.

[Katman]

Kind of my point. Make the slingers responsible for experimenting until they know what a safe dose is. If they aren't prepared to take what they are selling they shouldn't sell it.

Dude, you should share a joint some time.

[husaberg]

They should be safe as long as they can't roll a doobie.

They could eat it - but it wouldn't do them shit.

It was a post in reply to another referring to drugs vs guns what was the most dangerous to leave lying around someones stash need not just be dope.

[Big Dog]

Dude, you should share a joint some time.

Not my bag.
Why spend a lifetime collecting memories and sharpening the mind just to corrupt your memory banks?




Stupid phone / Tapatalk, apologies in advance.

[Katman]

It was a post in reply to another referring to drugs vs guns what was the most dangerous to leave lying around someones stash need not just be dope.

Are you suggesting the stash is more dangerous than the gun?

[husaberg]

Are you suggesting the stash is more dangerous than the gun?

Not always but each has its own risks. Plenty of peoples drug stashes both legal and illegal can kill kids. I would suggest more people lock up they rifles than lock up their stash though.
I can remember reading tiger balm can be lethal if ingested by a toddler. I would not have guessed that.

[Big Dog]

Apparently paracetamol is a regular kiddy killer.


Stupid phone / Tapatalk, apologies in advance.

[Katman]

I would suggest more people lock up they rifles than lock up their stash though.

Well like I said, leave Cannabis out of it (see what I did there) if you're looking for a danger to a toddler who can't roll a splif.

[TheDemonLord]

It's like a lot of things. Fuck up and everyone wants to make things safer because someone was able to fuck up . In the process, we criminalise way too many people and shrug our shoulders as if that's the only way it can be.

There is a link, I agree wholly... after all, you gotz to pay fer yer habit. Legalising drugs won't do that on its own, it will make a small dent, but the criminals "stealing" to feed their habit will do so irrespective of legality. One of the many reasons I favour an R.B.E. is that it removes the financial element and therefore the need for a drug addict to steal from someone else when the drugs are free. No internment and no "victims". But hey, peeps is too fucked in the head to realise that as the most likely outcome... something I refer to as fact .

If you meant that it's the users' definition of working that's important, then I agree. Too many folk believe that they have a higher (pun intended) claim to what the addict puts in their body, than the addict. They even make laws to make their disapproval cost the addict. I think such a bit fuckin cheeky actually... but when said addict is ready to quit, it ain't like we make it easy, especially if they have a criminal record. Meh. No R.B.E., good luck with dealing that that little issue too. Especially as the definition of "criminal" is changing all the time.

Ach people understand all too well. They break the law for a great many reasons, and all do it irrespective of education. We've come a long way from thou shalt not steal. Now we have definitions that legitimise theft... everyone knows from a moral standpoint that a theft has taken place, but under man's law, if you find a definition that legitimises that theft you're home and hosed. The vast majority of us know when we are committing a morally questionable act, and I don't see anything immoral when it comes to many things drug related. It ain't about education, it's about what can be gotten away with and draconian policy protects its own interests.

I'm actually for the death penalty. 3 strikes for "minor" (non-financially related i.e. moral) crimes with varying sentences before you're out... and for "major" crimes we go 1 "looooooong" jail term and anything after that, death. I'd also like a "new" contraption to be used. A simple board with holes drilled through, line the person up against the board and tie 5 wires around their torso. One around the neck, one through each armpit and one across the top of each thigh. Attach the ends of the wires to a drag car... and pull.

Aaaaaand back to an RBE again - lets just skip the foreplay, the main event and money shot:

I don't think it will work for numerous reasons, you think it will.

[unstuck]

Change the wording from "Death Penalty" to "Returning to a place of wondrous bliss and joy". Kinda makes you wonder what all the fuss is about really.

[friday]

funny how people who arent connected to the drug runners get uppity about death penalty especially in OZ (not talking about you lot your rabid)

an indian and an asian got shot , surprisingly not by Ozzies

what about abbos getting topped off by cops in WA every other day ? people are too busy to comment on that .

theres been actors and comedians and all sorts uploading themselves on the net , maybe its just prime time for self promotion or to keep the face in the media

Ive learnt about firing squads what I never knew before on this thread , my view on it is it should be 1 big one to the head not a squad

[mashman]

Aaaaaand back to an RBE again - lets just skip the foreplay, the main event and money shot:

I don't think it will work for numerous reasons, you think it will.

Really?

Yes we have done the dance... and I did address your points before adding what you call the money shot stuff for the consideration of anyone who wonders what the effect on crime would be, along with the other positive societal outcomes that we currently strive for but somehow never seem to be able to achieve (because lack of money!). It's valid and it is your choice.

But I think we were at a point where we agreed, pretty much, on the death stuff... and I would like to see that board/dragster idea considered .

[mashman]

Change the wording from "Death Penalty" to "Returning to a place of wondrous bliss and joy". Kinda makes you wonder what all the fuss is about really.

Why would you come here in the first place?

[Big Dog]

funny how people who arent connected to the drug runners get uppity about death penalty especially in OZ (not talking about you lot your rabid)

an indian and an asian got shot , surprisingly not by Ozzies

what about abbos getting topped off by cops in WA every other day ? people are too busy to comment on that .

theres been actors and comedians and all sorts uploading themselves on the net , maybe its just prime time for self promotion or to keep the face in the media

Ive learnt about firing squads what I never knew before on this thread , my view on it is it should be 1 big one to the head not a squad

So to extend that further why not use the "thumper" they use at the freezing works. That is supposedly humane and can be used thousands of times without reloading while still allowing for an open casket. Just turns the brain to soup.



Stupid phone / Tapatalk, apologies in advance.