Would not ACC look at riding gear other than the mandatory helmet?
Is there a relationship between motorcycle power/rider experience and crashes?
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
Still maintain Levy the licence not each bike since the cover is for injury of the person. Do that and the lower risk riders will consume more bikes leaving the inexperienced part timers less cheap bikes to buy. Before you argue this makes as much sense as anything else being tried and I just want to own a lot more bikes without insuring myself more often.![]()
I have evolved as a KB member.Now nothing I say should be taken seriously.
Are scooter crashes added to motorcycle or car statistics ? As they are ride on a car license it would make sense to be added to car statistics
Don't know, it makes me cringe when I see riders with no gloves or office attire.
Currently its either make it the law and you get fined for non compliance or education.
Sliding across the track at Taupo a few weeks ago showed me the value of gloves and leathers.
Talking to the guy at Star Insurance last week whilst looking at his basement of crash damaged bikes I asked about what the common crashes were.
Front end sliding out seemed to be a common one, in his opinion riders were going in to a corner too hot, then throttling off, unsettling the bike and off the road.
These were bikes with ABS and Traction Control.
If I was ACC I'd give a discount on the ACC portion of the rego for attendance at The California Superbike School or similar rider training.
More training and education and better riding gear.
DeMyer's Laws - an argument that consists primarily of rambling quotes isn't worth bothering with.
I don't give a fuck what conditions that are required BEFORE ACC will CONSIDER changes to the levy system.
I don't give a fuck about many things...............
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks