The fascist regime that made you a moron: Thanks dJonkey

[TheDemonLord]

Sorry thought you were up to speed on jewish history and the khazars

Sorry

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

you contradicted yourself at least twice in the waffling series of barely connected statements.

[husaberg]

I'm going to pick one (the Holocaust - mainly because it is the subject I have the most familiarity with) and ask this:

Skepticism that there are some facts we are not (and may never be) party to is one thing.

But it is a bold claim to infer that the Holocaust had a Why behind it that somehow the Jews were complicit in this.

You have challenged Bogan to do his own research - but on the above point (and your infered claim) can you cite some form of evidence?

You can't pick the holocaust though as Katman Yokel and Axel refuse to even contemplate it actually occurred at all.
It seems that if anyone did die in the camps it was merely a co-incidence an unfortunate result of disease or malnutrition according to what they actually post.

[Oscar]

Yes to answer that question . . .

But any bearing on what is being said here

Bit early for cheap sherry aint it ?

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

On the basis that most of your posts border on gibberish and lack any hint of grammar, spelling or basic English language skills, you probably shouldn’t cast aspersion of the alcoholic kind on other people, Bubb.

[TheDemonLord]

You can't pick the holocaust though as Katman Yokel and Axel refuse to even contemplate it actually occurred at all.

Well I can, that would just be a separate discussion (and FWIW, I have little tolerance for Holocaust deniers)

[Brian d marge]

So why don't you do the research about low interest rates, then?

That seems to be the way you operate - make a statement and then challenge others to research it - so google it yourself.

However in this case, I was addressing the question to someone else, so STFU.

Dude
I HAVE done the leg work

If you rememeber I challenged YOUR stupidity

And Im still waiting for your answer

Not my fault if ya dont know what your talking about

Anyhow . . How ya going to tackle this question
A. Ignore
B. Call everyone a cnt then disappear
C. Click on google and respond with some real info that might make someone think

Ive got the day off today and not much else to do
The barrel sprung a leak and the gold fish died so I cant take the occasional pot shot at them

So thank god you arrived

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

[Oscar]

Dude
I HAVE done the leg work

If you rememeber I challenged YOUR stupidity

And Im still waiting for your answer

Not my fault if ya dont know what your talking about

Anyhow . . How ya going to tackle this question
A. Ignore
B. Call everyone a cnt then disappear
C. Click on google and respond with some real info that might make someone think

Ive got the day off today and not much else to do
The barrel sprung a leak and the gold fish died so I cant take the occasional pot shot at them

So thank god you arrived

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

As I've mentioned previously, your lack of English as a first language does work against you.
Plus, there is the fact that you're a bit of a boring fellow, so I may have skipped some of your posts.
So, I tell you what, go and find a responsible adult and get them to type your query in English and I'll get right onto it.

[Katman]

But it is a bold claim to infer that the Holocaust had a Why behind it that somehow the Jews were complicit in this.

Did you miss the bit a few pages ago of the 1933 Daily Mail headline that read 'Jews declare war on Germany'?

The Jews certainly did nothing to endear themselves to the Germans.

(And my jury is still out on the whole gassing issue).

[TheDemonLord]

Dude
I HAVE done the leg work

From a purely academic Standpoint

If you have done the leg work, then by all means present your findings.

But you cannot assert in a public domain that you have proof to backup your statements and then withhold the proof, asking other people to verify it for themselves.

That isn't how peer review or reasoned debate happens. If you make a positive claim, you submit your proof. Then those who you make the claim to can analyze and interpret the evidence. Either they will find the Evidence robust and compelling and be forced to adopt different points of view, or they will find the evidence flimsy and inconclusive and challenge the positive claim.

(or as more often in the modern age, dismiss it out of hand because it disagrees with their per-concieved ideals)

[Brian d marge]

On the basis that most of your posts border on gibberish and lack any hint of grammar, spelling or basic English language skills, you probably shouldn’t cast aspersion of the alcoholic kind on other people, Bubb.

Hey I like being an alcoholic . . .I was just worried about you thats all

素敵なトライ馬鹿

Stephen

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

[Brian d marge]

From a purely academic Standpoint

If you have done the leg work, then by all means present your findings.

But you cannot assert in a public domain that you have proof to backup your statements and then withhold the proof, asking other people to verify it for themselves.

That isn't how peer review or reasoned debate happens. If you make a positive claim, you submit your proof. Then those who you make the claim to can analyze and interpret the evidence. Either they will find the Evidence robust and compelling and be forced to adopt different points of view, or they will find the evidence flimsy and inconclusive and challenge the positive claim.

(or as more often in the modern age, dismiss it out of hand because it disagrees with their per-concieved ideals)

Have many moons ago

Your late to the party

Sorry bout that

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

[TheDemonLord]

Did you miss the bit a few pages ago of the 1933 Daily Mail headline that read 'Jews declare war on Germany'?

The Jews certainly did nothing to endear themselves to the Germans.

(And my jury is still out on the whole gassing issue).

I did miss it - I would be interested to read.

There is still a world of difference between declaring war on a people and Not endearing yourself to a country to going to systematic genocide.

Even if I accept your claim on the first 2 points without any evidence, it does not in anyway, shape or form disprove the Holocaust.

For my interest however - why is your Jury out on the whole Gassing issue?

[husaberg]

Well I can, that would just be a separate discussion (and FWIW, I have little tolerance for Holocaust deniers)

Whilst you can, Its pointless when there is a core group here that doesn't buy into the fact it did occur.

[TheDemonLord]

Have many moons ago

Your late to the party

Sorry bout that

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

Not sufficient - you are making the claim here, so your proof needs to be here.

That which is submitted without proof may be dismissed in kind.

[Brian d marge]

Did you miss the bit a few pages ago of the 1933 Daily Mail headline that read 'Jews declare war on Germany'?

The Jews certainly did nothing to endear themselves to the Germans.

(And my jury is still out on the whole gassing issue).

And the fact that people leaving germany were paid to resettle in the promised land
Only took a small hit on savings actually

Too many . . . Hang on a minite . . .for my likin



Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk

[Brian d marge]

Not sufficient - you are making the claim here, so your proof needs to be here.

That which is submitted without proof may be dismissed in kind.

Just dismiss it then

Sent from my SC-01F using Tapatalk