If you give me some dimensions off a fixed plane, I can draw it up for you and measure the chain runs to see exactly what it will do. and if it would pose a significant problem.
the first pic is the first draft I drew for mine, which is ideal with the swingarm pivot in line with the axle and sprocket centres. so at rest the chain is in the tightest position, and only gets smaller as it travels through the arc. But I didn't like how the swingarm point was below the parallel of the axle and ground. so I redrew it and I think I can live with it getting 3mm tighter as it travels through the arc, the top run never gets short enough to worry about it throwing the chain. This is based on the 40mm of shock travel at the axle centre, which it will never achieve as the shock is to be mounted rearward of that point. I've got the opposite problem to you, my sprocket centre sits quite low in the motor (which is probably why moly builds then on 10's not 13's).
Don't think so. 1200 and 1400 are a different family of motors though they look like the 900/1000/1100 externally.
I had a 1400 apart not long back and was surprised how different it was.
Plenty of dry sump setups around for the 1200/1400 though. The Radical sports cars use them, the 1400 was dry sumped.
Only prob for a chair is that you've got to use a separate water pump. Dry sump pumps go where the water pump usually sits.
This is the car setup, replaces pressure pump too unlike i think how you've run the ZX10.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks