"So if you meet me, have some sympathy, have some courtesy, have some taste ..."
Out of 3 bikes only 1 is almost always registered and the rest fluctuate with use. I can't drive everything at once and why should I pay for something that is sitting in the garage.
How dare you bring facts instead of speculation!
Even calling your insurance company instead of just believing someone on-line. Double ewe tee eff mate.
![]()
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
The entire registration system is a load of shit. Why should I pay for 4x regos when i can only drive/ride one at a time
There are 2 different offences, one is failing to display a current licence label, the other is operating an unlicenced motor vehicle, or words to that effect.
One there is some grey area, the other there isn't.
Regarding insurance, I've just had a look at the wording of my policy, there is no specific mention of WOF or Rego, only the statement below which I suppose a valid WOF would assist with 'reasonable steps'
There is no cover if the motorcycle is overloaded or being used in an unsafe or unroadworthy condition. Cover will still apply if you can prove that you and the rider were unaware of such
condition and had taken all reasonable steps to maintain your motorcycle
Riding cheap crappy old bikes badly since 1987
Tagorama maps: Transalpers map first 100 tags..................Map of tags 101-200......................Latest map, tag # 201-->
Whilst no system is perfect, I'd rather the registration was tied to kilometers traveled than to a hard-coded expiry date. That way people would only pay for what they actually used and those with multiple vehicles would be able to be changed in a much more equitable way.
Alternatively, the costs could be added to the existing fuel tax instead of having to manage and pay for a separate registration system.
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks